AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Jimmy Crutison

AFRAM30 · AFRAM11 · ETHST1 · ETHST3 · AFRAM33 · AFRAM13 · AFRAM14A · AFRAM1 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
34.62%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless you are excellent at APA formatting and want a demanding discussion-heavy ethnic studies class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh APA GraderNitpicky FeedbackUnclear CriteriaDiscussion HeavyPolarizing
  • Recent reviews overwhelmingly call him a and tiny formatting errors.
  • Older reviews sometimes praise engaging lectures and real discussion, so experiences are polarized.
  • and frequent confusion about how to improve grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even good writers lose points for tiny APA or wording issues, and few graded items make recovery hard.

and in-person reviews; older in-person students sometimes still earned As with strong participation.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content and discussions are manageable, but writing volume and .

Online emphasizes weekly reflections and films; and participation pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

, and skipping is risky.

; online still stresses participation and weekly posts.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and recent students repeatedly and clarity.

Recent online and in-person reviews are largely negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students say he never gives full credit and , and minor APA errors.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Not endless busywork, but , and a .

Format shift

Online leans paper-heavy; and participation load.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Some students love his discussions, but many say he does not teach clearly and .

Format shift

; recent online experience is mostly poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Papers, reflections, APA formatting, discussions, and a .

Format shift

Both formats center writing and participation more than classic tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and older praise for energetic, discussion-driven lectures.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Professor Crutison is an . If you plan to take this class, make sure your APA format is impeccable”
AFRAM1
“Wouldn't recommend if you want a ”
ETHST1
“By far this was one of the .”
Afram33

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report harsh , and heavy writing with weak teaching guidance.

Main concern

and hard-to-find assignments.

What students said

“Worst professor I've had so far. teachers who never gives full credit on assignments and .”
AFRAM1
“If you don't good at APA format, even though you are a .”
AFRAM1
“Easy pass , but lots of ”
ETHST1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is writing and participation focused with strict .

So Many PapersWeekly ReflectionsAPA StrictnessDiscussion ParticipationFew High-Stakes Items

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and discussion performance; some courses feel paper-heavy like English.

APA Format FocusClass DiscussionsPapers and Projects
“make sure your APA format is impeccable; he always finds a ”
AFRAM1
“ and formatting for if the outline isn't followed correctly”
ETHST1

Online

Online work centers on weekly reflections, films or readings, and .

Weekly ReflectionsMany PapersAPA Deduction HeavyLate Grades
“Weekly reflections are 5-7 sentences per all 3 paragraphs & ”
AFRAM30
“never and ”
AFRAM1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you don't good at APA format, even though you are a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews across online and and polarization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“doesn't even teach, you must adhere to all of his formats but he doesn't even give any sort of help nor guideline.”

⚖️

18/100

“ ”

👎 Recommendation

28/100

“ !!!!”

🗣️ Discussion Style

70/100

“He allows you to be your unapologetic self as you partake in some awesome interactive lectures.”

Theme 1

📝

  • Minor
  • Get ready to get marked down for the slightest mistake
  • Will nitpick you from a Social Justice perspective

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You always feel pumped to hear one of Crutison's lectures
  • His lesson plans are non existent and chats all class

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Warnings

  • i dread every week
  • this bruh was actually mad annoying

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-six detailed reviews across online and in-person, recent and older, with a .

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ETHST18 reviews
AFRAM17 reviews
AFRAM114 reviews
AFRAM303 reviews
AFRAM131 review
Show 3 more courses
AFRAM14A1 review
Afram331 review
ETHST31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 9

B range

6

B 5 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 1