AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Sara Tesfai

HUMN30A · HUM30A · HUMAN10 · PHIL10 · HUMAN30A · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
38.46%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid for PHIL10 unless , and and AI-detection drama.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy writing loadSlow or absent feedbackTurnitin AI disputesPolarized online PHIL10Self-paced content dumps
  • Recent online PHIL10 reviews are , and AI-cheating accusations.
  • Older humanities sections praise meaningful content but and papers.
  • and timely grades face high risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some call content an easy A on volume alone, but , and AI accusations make a clean A risky.

Online PHIL10 is where grade anxiety peaks; older sections sound somewhat more manageable.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Weekly long papers, long audio lectures, and and time intensive.

Online reviews stress paper volume most; and reading.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Online attendance is often not a real class meeting, while and .

Online is mostly asynchronous; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

because students feel unsupported and over-policed on originality.

Older online humanities and ; recent PHIL10 online drives the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

26/100

, and AI-detector disputes dominate recent online comments.

Format shift

Harshness is concentrated in online PHIL10; older courses sound fairer but .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students report weekly 500-1000 word papers, long recordings, and .

Format shift

Heavy writing load is clearest online; .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Content can be interesting, but many say she is absent, late, and relies on other professors' materials.

Format shift

; online recent reviews rate presence very low.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment , and reflections rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Paper and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Older in-person humanities reviews are more mixed-to-positive on engagement but and writing.

Main concern

Even face-to-face, some felt they learned from materials more than from her teaching.

What students said

“This class is really engaging. Sara gives students opportunities to make the class their own”
HUM30A
“ and too much writing. I learned from the materials rather than the professor.”
HUM30A

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and frequent frustration with communication and .

Main concern

Turnitin AI flags, delayed grades, and an absent teaching presence.

What students said

“Professor uses turnitin AI detector, which is inaccurate. You may have to fight for your grade/defend your own original work.”
PHIL10
“The professor never responds to emails, never posts assignments .”
PHIL10
“1,000 & 500 worded writing assignments weekly.”
PHIL10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Risk comes less from classic proctored finals and more from heavy writing plus aggressive originality checks.

Weekly long papersTurnitin AI detectorLate gradingRecycled lecture videos

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments focus on long outside lectures and heavy writing rather than formal proctored exams.

Heavy readingMany papersOutside recorded lectures
“we had to listen to at least 4 of hour long lectures from various sources. and too much writing.”
HUM30A

Online

Online reviews emphasize , and weekly papers with little live teaching.

Turnitin AI detectorWeekly papersLate assignment posts
“Professor uses turnitin AI detector, which is inaccurate.”
PHIL10
“I was accused of cheating on an ”
PHIL10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor uses turnitin AI detector, which is inaccurate. You may have to fight for your grade/defend your own original work... Dropped with a W.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, weighting recent online PHIL10 complaints against older humanities praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Presence

36/100

“She didn't teach the class. We were just given audios of other professors”

📝 Workload Intensity

24/100

“1,000 & 500 worded writing assignments weekly.”

⚖️

26/100

“I was accused of cheating on an ”

👍 Older Content Praise

70/100

“The material and the way Prof Tesfai goes about teaching it are amazing though.”

Theme 1

🖥️ About Online PHIL10

  • This class is a total scam
  • I'm tired of so many lazy professors leaning solely on turnitin.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of reading and about a paper and a half per week.
  • So many papers
  • and too much writing.

Theme 3

✨ About Meaningful Content

  • Material was extremely relevant to life.
  • This class is really engaging.
  • The .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

13 reviews with a and an older positive cluster; detail is strong but opinions are polarized.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PHIL107 reviews
HUM30A3 reviews
HUMAN101 review
HUMAN30A1 review
HUMN30A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 5