AI Rate Professor

Biology

Pallavi Lal

BIOL76 · BIO28 · BIO74 · BIO75 · BIO3 · BIOL3 · BIO101 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate inconsistent structure.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest HeavyDisorganized LecturesTough GraderHard to ReachPolarizing
  • Recent BIO3 reviews describe monotone lectures, useless study guides, and tests that do not match class focus.
  • Older biotech and micro students praise passion, mentorship, and industry skills.
  • Email response and organization complaints are frequent in negative reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

, and several students report incomplete or low grades despite effort.

; online sample is more positive but tiny.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Microbiology and biotech content plus fast lectures and .

Both formats treat micro as hard; recent in-person BIO3 is especially brutal.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and skip-class tags appear.

; online data is sparse.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

Would-take-again is under half; while .

earlier online and lab reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

, and little leave limited recovery room.

Format shift

Strictness is concentrated in recent in-person BIO3 reviews.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

, and frequent exams create a demanding load.

Format shift

and lecture load is documented more than online.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Some call her knowledgeable and caring; many , and unhelpful answers.

Format shift

Online and 2021-22 reviews rate teaching higher than 2025 in-person clusters.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Test-heavy tags and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

many 2025 students call lectures abysmal and , while some earlier students felt challenged but supported.

Main concern

, and poor communication.

What students said

“ !! I have never gotten a C in a class before this one”
BIO75
“ .”
BIO3
“Tough testing but .”
BIOL3

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Small online sample , and clear scientific communication training.

Main concern

Very few online reviews to confirm current online experience.

What students said

“ and help plan our end of semester projects, which was extremely helpful.”
BIO74
“Pallavi will make time to meet with you individually and prepare you for anything missed.”
BIOL76
“Her passion & knowledge of the subject was evident in lectures”
BIO3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Frequent exams and make assessment high-risk.

Test HeavyQuizzes Not Matching LecturesHeavy ExamsLabsLittle Extra Credit

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and hard, with study guides often called useless and little recovery credit.

Test HeavyQuizzesLabsMemorization
“Her class's quizzes and focuses on”
BIO3
“ ”
BIO101
“ lot”
BIOL3

Online

Online reviews focus more on projects and .

ProjectsFeedbackScientific Communication
“after this class I had a different types using excel”
BIO74

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and when multiple people did poorly on a quiz she said that it's possible to make up with later on, in which she gave out less than 5 points in total”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting the 2025 in-person backlash against earlier mentorship praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“She's a kind teacher, but .”

📉

34/100

“ and she talks fast with a heavy accent.”

👍 Mentorship Side

75/100

“This mentorship helped me in job interviews”

📧 Accessibility

25/100

“ ? Goodluck trying to reach her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • so well

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you don't memorize every bit of information you fail
  • Tough testing but
  • .

Theme 3

🔬

  • opening up the opportunity
  • Only thing we got from the .
  • GREAT and RELATABLE.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews with rich detail, but strong time-based polarization (glowing 2021-22 vs harsh 2025) reduces consistency.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 59

Course coverage

BIO38 reviews
BIOL35 reviews
BIO742 reviews
BIO752 reviews
BIOL762 reviews
Show 2 more courses
BIO1011 review
BIO281 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 7

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Incomplete 4 · Not sure yet 1