AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Cynthia Mahabir

SOC13 · SOCIOLOGY1 · SOC · SOC5 · SOCIOLOGY120 · SOCIO1A · SOCIOLOGY · SOC1 · SOC2 · SOCIO1 · SOC01 · SOCIO · SOC02 · SOC15 · 52 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
45.45%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you want a demanding sociology course and and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy reading and papersStrict classroom rulesPoor communicationPolarizing rigor
  • Many students report , and little flexibility.
  • Communication problems include delayed emails, off-Canvas contact, and .
  • A minority who keep up with readings and and comments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Tough-grader tags and many B/C/F or work.

Both online and ; online failures and drops are especially common.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

, and lecture-heavy pacing make the content intellectually and workload-wise demanding.

Challenge appears in and multi-paragraph assignments.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Many sections require attendance or .

In person is often mandatory; online also drops inactive students and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Take-again sits near 45 percent with frequent run-away warnings outweighing minority praise.

Recent online reviews are especially negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students repeatedly call her a and personal-opinion friction in scoring.

Format shift

and in person, with .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of , and projects are common.

Format shift

and writing dominate both formats.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Some find her passionate and informative, but many describe confusion, bias, rudeness, or disorganization.

Format shift

In-person opinions are polarized; recent online experience leans poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and tests or pop quizzes tied to readings.

Format shift

Online leans assignment-heavy; in person adds exams and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students split between praise for passion and organization versus complaints of rudeness, overload, and harsh rules.

Main concern

, and tough written grading.

What students said

“She has by far been the most influential professor in my life.”
SOC5
“Extremely tough teacher who refuses to meet with students outside of class no matter what.”
SOC2
“Run, RUN AWAY.”
SOCIO1A

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews skew negative on hard grading, , and .

Main concern

Missing due dates and .

What students said

“ ! They do not post their ”
SOC13
“This teacher grades very HARD !!!”
SOC13
“she is one of the only professors I've had who actually gives a lot of feedback.”
SOC15

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments reward dense reading and precise writing, with little evidence of open-book leniency.

Reading-based testsPop quizzesWriting-heavy promptsTough written grading

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes track lectures and and tough scoring.

Reading-based examsPop quizzesLecture-heavy prepStrict rules
“All of her tests contain questions that require you regurgitate facts from 2012 and YouTube links .”
SOC1
“The and prompt she gave us beforehand”
SOC5

Online

Online comments emphasize multi-paragraph questions and .

Long written responsesHard assignment gradingUnclear Canvas due dates
“ 3-4 for 1 question.”
SOC13
“This teacher grades very HARD !!!”
SOC13

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! They do not post their ”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (6 online, 44 in , and polarized teaching opinions. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Very rude teacher! Does not know how to teach! ”

⚖️

22/100

“This teacher grades very HARD !!!”

📚 Workload Intensity

25/100

“she assigned an unreasonable amount of readingmuch of it through e-mail at the last minute.”

❤️ Positive Outlier

70/100

“She has by far been the most influential professor in my life.”

Theme 1

📉 About Difficulty & Grades

  • grades very HARD
  • You cannot miss a single assignment!

Theme 2

📬 About Communication

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Classroom Style

  • She talks for the entire class
  • Yells at students and puts them on blast
  • encourages students, listens to class participation

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

52

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across two decades with and heavy-workload themes provide high confidence despite polarity.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 57
3 out of 54
2 out of 511
1 out of 519

Course coverage

SOC119 reviews
SOC136 reviews
SOC015 reviews
SOC53 reviews
SOCIOLOGY3 reviews
Show 9 more courses
SOC2 reviews
SOC152 reviews
SOC22 reviews
SOCIO1A2 reviews
SOCIOLOGY12 reviews
SOC021 review
SOCIO1 review
SOCIO11 review
SOCIOLOGY1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 6 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 5

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 1