AI Rate Professor

English

C Weidenbach

ENGL1B · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENG1 · ENG201B · 17BSHAKESPEARE · ENGLISH1A · ENG1AL12 · ENGLISH10B · ENG1B · ENGL201B · ENGB · ENG17 · ENG10A · ENGLISH17A · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Avoid if you want real English instruction; only consider him for a low-effort pass and political discussion.

Best fit · Easy A HunterPolitical RantsEasy AInconsistent GradingNot Much EnglishPolarizing
  • Many students say you learn little English while he lectures on politics
  • Grades are often easy if you turn work in, but fairness and favoritism are disputed
  • like him as a person

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Many students report easy As with , and light testing.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews to compare.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Content and workload are repeatedly called easy, with few tests and limited English skill building.

Only in-person reviews exist; they consistently describe low academic rigor.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

while others say you can miss class and still pass.

Only in-person data; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and many students say you learn nothing English-related.

All reviews are in person and split between personal likeability and teaching failure.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Often loose with due dates and easy As, but multiple students allege favoritism and unfair scoring.

Format shift

In-person only; leniency is common but not evenly applied.

Workload

Light

82/100

, and make the load easy for most.

Format shift

In-person only; workload stays light across years.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

He can be caring and discussion-oriented, but students often say he does not teach English fundamentals.

Format shift

All in-person; praise centers on personality while criticism targets instruction.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

structured skill-based English exams.

Format shift

In-person only; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

easy workload and , but frequent complaints of political tangents, weak English teaching, and uneven standards.

Main concern

Little actual English instruction and .

What students said

“Be prepared to listen to him talk nothing about he fundamentals of English and all about government politics and police brutality.”
ENG1AL12
“I did not try and openly voiced my disdain for his political rants which took up 5 whole classes, yet I still received an A.”
17BSHAKESPEARE
“ and he gave me a B, but my friend who did hardly any work got an A.”
ENGL201B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is light and reviews.

Few TestsEssay FocusLoose DeadlinesOral Presentations

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report few or , and loose paper deadlines.

Few or No TestsShort EssaysLate Papers AcceptedOral Presentations
“ and .”
ENG1AL12
“He is very loose with grading and .”
17BSHAKESPEARE
“Short stories. couple essays. class discussions. mini quizes on suffixes of words. midterm and final.”
ENG201B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I have his class & so far he he's taught me NOTHING English related. He consistently rambles on about his political thoughts.”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 in-person reviews only, highlighting political digressions, easy grades, and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“I have his class & so far he he's taught me NOTHING English related.”

🅰️ Easy Grade

84/100

“i did get an A with very little work put in”

⚖️

40/100

“ and he gave me a B, but my friend who did hardly any work got an A.”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“if you actually want to LEARN something & improve your .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • talk nothing about he fundamentals of English and all about government politics
  • this is an English class bro.. not some hippy cult convention
  • He is a great teacher and a good man.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A if U do your work
  • I still received an A
  • and

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fairness and Climate

  • he plays favoritism
  • he shoots down people who come up with different opinions
  • All he does is talk about politics and is inconsistent about what he wants

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

38 in-person reviews give volume, but many are old, sparse, and polarized between personality praise and teaching complaints.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 57
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENG1A10 reviews
ENG1B6 reviews
ENGL1A5 reviews
ENGL1B3 reviews
ENG12 reviews
Show 10 more courses
ENGL201B2 reviews
ENGLISH10B2 reviews
17BSHAKESPEARE1 review
ENG10A1 review
ENG171 review
ENG1AL121 review
ENG201B1 review
ENGB1 review
ENGLISH17A1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1