AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Nigus Teklehaymanot

MATH01 · MATH203 · MAT42617 · MATH1 · MATH30528 · MATH13 · MATH182 · MATH3A · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
84%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Must-take math professor if , and real support to earn a strong grade.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear LecturesCaringPatientExtra CreditEasy A with Effort
  • and student input on pacing.
  • Homework and quizzes align with tests; and .
  • Strong majority would take again despite a few reports of harshness or inflexibility.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

, and tests match practice; and partial-credit leniency make As very attainable.

Online comments most explicitly say easy A; +.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Material can still be calculus or stats level, but and pacing keep intellectual challenge manageable.

Both formats call content doable when lectures are followed; online Calc II still not described as trivial.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory or say participation matters, though a few say optional.

Online and in-person .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

About 84% would take again and , and highly recommended for beginners.

Recommendation is strong in both formats; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and full credit for shown understanding even with wrong final answers.

Format shift

Online emphasizes partial-credit leniency; a .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Regular homework and , but students call it manageable and .

Format shift

Both formats report frequent homework that maps directly to quizzes and tests.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students overwhelmingly praise clarity, patience, examples, and genuine care for understanding.

Format shift

Online and harsh-personality outliers.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and tests all matter, with quiz and .

Format shift

Online comments note quizzes and ; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and leniency, with a small minority calling him rude or inflexible.

Main concern

A few MATH182 or MATH01 voices report harsh grading personality or .

What students said

“I've failed stats before but he made stats so easy to understand.”
MATH13
“he teaches at uci but from experience he's the ”
MATH1
“EXTREMELY rude. .”
MATH182

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students rave about thorough , and easy As if you do the homework.

Main concern

Some courses stay textbook-heavy and .

What students said

“ ; he's the best!”
MATH1
“he , and biggest which is that I've never had a professor who is so open to student input.”
MATH1
“ hold their hands through the problems!”
MAT42617

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams stay fair and and class examples without surprise curveballs.

Tests Match HomeworkNo CurveballsPartial Credit for WorkFlexible Test DatesExtra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and he has stayed late for ; no strong evidence of harsh proctoring software.

Makeup Exam FlexibilityHomework-AlignedFair Difficulty
“I was once late for an exam but and stay late to make up the test.”
MATH13
“he ”
MATH1

Online

Online reviews say tests and quizzes are easy if you attend and and credit for shown work.

Homework-Aligned TestsFlexible DatesPartial Credit
“The tests and class and do the homework.”
MATH3A
“ if your work shows that you understand the problem, even if you get the answer wrong.”
MATH1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Nigus is probably one of the , if not the best. ... I don't love math, but his dedication to teaching us really made me want to try harder to understand it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews (14 online, 11 in person), highlighting clarity, care, and . Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Quality

90/100

“ and thorough with his lectures and went through many examples to help us understand the material.”

👍 Recommendation

88/100

“ ; he's the best!”

🅰️ Easy A Path

82/100

“Not that hard but if and pay attention to his classes, you will get an easy A.”

❤️ Student Support

85/100

“ hold their hands through the problems!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • clear and thorough with his lectures
  • makes stats so easy to understand
  • thorough with his lectures and always makes sure the class understands

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you will get an easy A
  • tests and

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and cares about his students
  • He's patient and understanding.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

25 detailed reviews from 2020-2024 across many math courses show strong grade and recommendation consistency.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH19 reviews
MATH2034 reviews
MATH133 reviews
MATH012 reviews
MATH1822 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH305282 reviews
MATH3A2 reviews
MAT426171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 5 · A 13 · A- 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values