AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Courtney Miller

ARCH12 · ARCH10 · AET111 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you need an easy grade and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterUnprepared and scatterbrainedEasy graderFew assignmentsLecture-heavy PowerPointsInconsistent experience
  • Teaching quality swings wildly by semester; many call him unprepared or scatterbrained.
  • and assignments are sparse, so grades can be high despite weak instruction.
  • Online and in-person students both report weak lesson plans and frustration with questions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

, and A or A+ outcomes with light work.

Easy grades appear in both online and in-person ARCH courses.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Low difficulty ratings and sparse assignments make content light, though .

Both formats describe low intellectual challenge relative to typical architecture work.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; online often optional.

Online ARCH10 listed optional; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Would-take-again is about 40 percent and several reviews call the experience among the worst.

Negative online ARCH10 review is especially strong; in-person opinions are mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

84/100

Students say he is always an and high letter grades.

Format shift

Leniency is reported for both online and in-person sections.

Workload

Light

74/100

Assignments are few and far between; .

Format shift

; online still has projects and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Repeated unprepared, scatterbrained, PowerPoint-reading, and .

Format shift

Weak teaching is reported online and in person, with one positive ARCH10 outlier.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Few assignments and in these reviews.

Format shift

Neither ; projects and sparse tasks dominate.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In person he is often an , but also unprepared, frustrated, and lecture-heavy.

Main concern

No real lesson plan, raises voice, and teaches by doing it for you.

What students said

“He never really as a lesson plan, but gets frustrated if you don't know how to do things he's never taught.”
ARCH10
“Courtney was tasked to teach a class he was unprepared to teach and took out his frustrations on his students.”
ARCH10

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one calls it a and chaotic with projects replacing low quizzes.

Main concern

Unprepared instruction and .

What students said

“One of the , he was very nice but unprepared and scatterbrained.”
ARCH10
“Whether or not you like him will depend on your sense of humor. I think he's funny and seriously chaotic.”
ARCH12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize sparse grading and projects more than formal exams; .

Few graded itemsProjects replace low quizzesNo clear proctoring details

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam format; closed-book or proctoring details are not stated.

Few graded thingsAssignment-based
“while he was always an and far between.”
ARCH10

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and projects replacing lowest quiz scores; webcam or proctoring is not mentioned.

Projects replace lowest quizzesPowerPoint lecturesNo proctoring mentioned
“ .”
ARCH12

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the , he was very nice but unprepared and scatterbrained.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, , and format split. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“I found the teacher to be scatterbrained, hard to communicate with, and was offended by some inappropriate things he said.”

⚖️

84/100

“while he was always an and far between.”

👎 Recommendation

32/100

“One of the , he was very nice but unprepared and scatterbrained.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He never really as a lesson plan
  • instruction was mostly PowerPoint that was recited word for word
  • He would raise his voice when students had questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • always an
  • and far between

Theme 3

🌀 About Consistency

  • Your experience with him will vary wildly semester to semester
  • Whether or not you like him will depend on your sense of humor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only 6 reviews from 2011-2024 with mixed detail; patterns of and weak prep appear but sample is small.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ARCH104 reviews
AET1111 review
ARCH121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1