AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Barbara Villatoro

CAL2 · MATH201 · MATH203 · MATH13 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Avoid unless ; organization and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedTough graderConfusing materialsFast paceTests easier than teaching
  • Most reviews call her unorganized with .
  • when tests themselves are not hard.
  • A and fine if you keep up with homework and notes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

, but tough grading on small mistakes and .

Online emphasizes harsh grading; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content difficulty is moderate; the bigger barrier is pace, organization, and .

Both formats describe manageable test content but .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Online listed optional attendance; .

Only the as not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Would-take-again is 0 percent and most detailed reviews are strongly negative on teaching and organization.

Online is strongly negative; but still leans negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Students report and a .

Format shift

Harsh grading is clearest in the online review; but still complains about teaching.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Homework and notes matter, but reviews do not describe an .

Format shift

Workload comments are sparse in both formats.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

, and flustered responses dominate the narrative.

Format shift

Poor organization is reported online and in person; a .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Online homework plus tests appear together; comments lack a .

Format shift

and tests without precise weights.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some say OK and , and hard to learn from.

Main concern

and vague materials force students to teach themselves.

What students said

“ and gets flustered way too easily.”
MATH203
“This and the note is all over the place.”
CAL2
“Not too hard, not too easy. As long as and .”
MATH13

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The recent online MATH201 review calls her a and .

Main concern

and poor organization online.

What students said

“Such a of your points for a little mistake. ”
MATH201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but prep materials can be vague and .

Tests described as easyOnline homework problemsVague PPT prep

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students say tests are pretty easy relative to ; formal proctoring is not discussed.

Easy testsHomework and notes matter
“ !”
CAL2
“As long as and .”
MATH13

Online

Online ; exam software is not mentioned.

Harsh partial-credit cutsUnorganized materials
“Such a of your points for a little mistake. ”
MATH201

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Such a of your points for a little mistake. ”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting disorganization and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“This and the note is all over the place.”

⚖️

24/100

“Such a of your points for a little mistake.”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“I had her for an online class and I have to say it was the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and gets flustered way too easily
  • vague and
  • the note is all over the place

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • little mistake
  • Not too hard, not too easy

Theme 3

🧩 About Organization

  • Her responses to the online questions
  • wastes time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 6 reviews, many old, with limited grade data and uneven detail reduce confidence.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH132 reviews
MATH2012 reviews
CAL21 review
MATH2031 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values