AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Nnenna Umelloh

CIS61 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her for engaging OOP lectures and if you already code a bit; skip if you .

Best fit · Effort For RewardQueen of OOPAmazing lecturesClear grading criteriaEXTRA CREDITMixed depth
  • Students split between inspiring OOP lectures and .
  • and participation matters, with if you show effort.
  • An A is attainable with effort and , but some say you leave without strong coding gains.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students say an A is not hard with effort, make-ups, and , even if learning depth varies.

All evidence is from in-person CIS61 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

prior coding helps, but you may still learn Python and OOP from scratch.

All evidence is from in-person CIS61 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory and note that participation matters.

All evidence is from in-person CIS61 reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

One student rates her a 10/10 must-have while another questions limited depth and .

All evidence is from in-person CIS61 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

, and support recoverable grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is manageable but you must participate and prepare for .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Fun outgoing lectures impress some, while others feel content depth and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

Midterm and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person CIS61 feels fun and outgoing for one student, while and .

Main concern

writing Python.

What students said

“Queen of OOP! Opportunity to make up work as long as you are putting in the effort.”
CIS61
“The mid-term and ; they mainly test whether you remember these irrelevant concepts.”
CIS61

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams emphasize remembering course concepts with little live coding.

In-person midtermIn-person finalConcept-heavy testsLittle coding on exams

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final test mostly non-coding concepts rather than Python skills.

In-person midtermIn-person finalConcept-heavy testsLittle coding on exams
“The mid-term and ; they mainly test whether you remember these irrelevant concepts.”
CIS61

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Queen of OOP! Opportunity to make up work as long as you are putting in the effort.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting split . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“Fun, and outgoing Prof 10/10”

📈 Easy A Potential

78/100

“Getting an A in this course is not difficult, but you won't learn much.”

📝

48/100

“The mid-term and ; they mainly test whether you remember these irrelevant concepts.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Queen of OOP!
  • Amazing lectures
  • Fun, and outgoing Prof 10/10

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Getting an A in this course is not difficult, but you won't learn much.
  • Opportunity to make up work as long as you are putting in the effort.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • The mid-term and
  • Too much emphasis is placed on some irrelevant concepts.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only two mixed in-person reviews from early 2024 limit confidence despite clear opposing themes.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIS612 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1