AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Brian Johnson

HUMAN30B · HUMAN30A · HUMAN6 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

; expect long weekly writing and tougher grading online.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesInspirationalLots of homeworkTough graderGives good feedback
  • In-person humanities students love his lectures, humility, and life-applied philosophy.
  • and harsher grading.
  • , and some courses emphasize .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

, but online students say he is a .

; in-person comments emphasize effort-based assessment.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is engaging rather than trivial, with substantial reading and weekly writing.

; in person focuses more on lectures and applied philosophy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

while others require it, so flexibility depends on the course.

Online reports mixed attendance rules; in .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

online workload complaints.

In-person recommendations are glowing; online is more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

He can grade on effort and , yet multiple students tag him as a .

Format shift

Online grades feel harsher than the more effort-friendly in-person tone.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Weekly mini-essays, discussion posts, and three units.

Format shift

Workload complaints concentrate in online HUMAN30B.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students praise amazing lectures, humor, inspiration, and tying personal life to philosophy.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strongest in person and still present online when students engage.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grading centers on weekly assignments and papers; .

Format shift

Online is assignment-heavy; in .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students call him fantastic, humble, and lecture-driven with life-relevant philosophy and .

Main concern

Some sections still expect attendance or steady weekly work published up front.

What students said

“Brian was fantastic!! If you have ever taken a class at Laney with Amir Sabzevary and loved it, then you want to take a class with Brian Johnson”
HUMAN6
“ and humble. You will learn a lot and feel better in life after his class.”
HUMAN30A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online HUMAN30B students find the material interesting but and harsh scoring.

Main concern

Heavy weekly essays and credit.

What students said

“I found the material extremely interesting while the and he is a harsher grader, it was 100% worth it.”
HUMAN30B
“LOADS of homework. even though its only a 3 credit class, the amount of as if it was a 4 credit core class.”
HUMAN30B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly weekly writing rather than strict proctored exams.

No final in some coursesWeekly mini-essaysNo quiz or exam in some sectionsAssignment-based grading

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

some classes, with homework published early and .

No quiz or examHomework published earlyEffort-based grading
“No quiz, or exam. to work on earlier”
HUMAN30A

Online

Online and mini-essays, with at least .

Weekly assignmentsMini-essaysNo final
“There also wasn't a the weekly assignments which are kind of mini-essays.”
HUMAN30B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Brian was fantastic!! If you have ever taken a class at Laney with Amir Sabzevary and loved it, then you want to take a class with Brian Johnson (he is like a baby Amir).”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (2 online, 3 in person), highlighting the lecture praise versus online workload tradeoff. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Lecture Energy

82/100

“Great lectures, really takes what YOU bring to class (personal life & issues, etc.) and ties it beautifully with the material.”

📚 Heavy Weekly Writing

30/100

“there are discussion posts and .”

👍

78/100

“I found the material extremely interesting while the and he is a harsher grader, it was 100% worth it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and humble
  • Amazing lectures
  • Always free coffee and wisdom in his classes

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he is a
  • He will never give you a 100
  • He grades based on your efforts

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • LOADS of homework
  • There's a good amount of readings

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews show a and useful detail, but the sample remains small.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HUMAN30B2 reviews
HUMAN62 reviews
HUMAN30A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1