AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Jennifer Iljas

PSYCH1 · INTRO001A · PYCH1A · PHSYC · PSYCH1A · PSCH1A · PSYCH · PSCH101 · PSYC1 · PSY101 · PSYCHOLOGY1A · PSY1A · PSYCH101 · 116 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
21.74%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

; only consider if you need a flexible easy-ish grade and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedOff-Topic RantsExpensive Self-Published BookUnprofessionalInconsistent Attendance
  • Lectures are widely called rambling and off-topic with little real psychology content
  • Self-published expensive textbook is poorly written yet often the only test source
  • Many still get A/B with light formal work, but

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Some call it Easy A with few graded items and retakes, but others fail or struggle with and book.

Both formats report mixed grade outcomes; confusion is common online and in person.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Content is intro psych but teaching chaos makes learning hard even when grades are soft.

Online and in person both rate intellectual challenge as low but frustrating.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Many tags and comments say skip and you will not pass, though enforcement is inconsistent.

; online has different engagement problems.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Very low take-again rate and and no learning.

Online reviews are especially harsh; in-person still majority negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, and easy As; others call her a tough or .

Format shift

Leniency stories appear more in person; .

Workload

Light

68/100

Often few papers and a handful of tests, though .

Format shift

Similar light formal load online and in person with .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Persistent complaints of rants, no real lectures, forgetfulness, and unreadiness outweigh rare warm reviews.

Format shift

Both formats rate teaching quality poorly; online unresponsiveness is acute.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Typically a few tests plus one paper; quizzes and tests tied to her book.

Format shift

and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person Psych is dominated by complaints of , and unstructured lectures.

Main concern

Little learning despite possible easy grades and .

What students said

“If you want to actually learn anything, youre not going to in her class.”
PSYCH1A
“ .”
PSYCHOLOGY1A
“Really nicer professor, just very poor teacher. I learned close to nothing. Easy A.”
PSYCH1A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and unresponsive; exams sometimes never open and students report learning nothing.

Main concern

Instructor disappears for weeks and .

What students said

“ of online classes.”
PSY1A
“Disappears from an online class for weeks at a time.”
PSYCH1
“This class sucks. She talks about 1 thing and goes to another topic. READS OFF THE TEXBOOK.”
PSYCH1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Multiple-choice and book-based tests with uneven organization; .

Multiple ChoiceBook-Based TestsOccasional Retakes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

book; reviews and dates change unpredictably.

Book-Based Multiple ChoiceUnclear Review DaysFew Graded Items
“Easy A. .”
PSYCH1A
“ ”
PSCH1A

Online

; structure is unreliable.

Unreliable Online ExamsBook-Based
“We didn't have a final because she never realized or remembered to open the exam.”
PSY1A
“I missed an online test, and she re-opened it for me”
PSYCH1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Really nicer professor, just very poor teacher. I learned close to nothing. Easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting disorganization, weak learning, and textbook complaints. Credibility rating: High.

💥 Teaching Disaster

28/100

“This class is trash.”

📚 Bad Textbook

25/100

“the self-published textbooks were expensive yet rarely referenced, poorly written, and unsellable”

🗣️ Off-Topic Lectures

30/100

“most of the time, she spends a lot of our time talking about drugs and other inappropriate topics”

👎 Avoid

22/100

“Take someone else for Psych 1A”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her class consists of nonsensical rants
  • . Did not follow the syllabus at all
  • She goes off topic.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A.
  • She will do anything for you to get an A
  • I failed I bought the book but didn't understand her

Theme 3

📖 About the Book

  • Books are written by the professor, so you can't find them on Amazon
  • Her book is 200 dollars and
  • because it is pointless to buy it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

116

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with highly consistent negative themes on organization and learning justify high credibility.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 511
3 out of 518
2 out of 525
1 out of 549

Course coverage

PSYCH1A20 reviews
PSCH1A12 reviews
INTRO001A3 reviews
PSCH1012 reviews
PSY1A2 reviews
Show 8 more courses
PSYC12 reviews
PSYCH1012 reviews
PSYCHOLOGY1A2 reviews
PHSYC1 review
PSY1011 review
PSYCH1 review
PSYCH11 review
PYCH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1