AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Ulysses Acevedo

ETHST1 · MLAT22496 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Good pick for a supportive humanities course if you keep up with readings and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAccommodatingClear grading criteriaSupportiveReading-heavyMixed communication
  • Most students find him caring, accommodating, and .
  • , and an .
  • One online review cites poor grade transparency and slow or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Reported A/A+ , and flexibility on late work make high grades reachable with steady work.

Online reviews report A/A+; the but no grade.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is interesting and manageable, though readings matter and difficulty ratings sit mid-low.

Both formats describe manageable content; online emphasizes readings and peer discussion.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and not stated in others, so policy is inconsistent.

One online and the in-person review mark mandatory; other .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

75/100

Three of and learning, despite one communication disaster review.

Online is mixed (2 yes, 1 no); the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and easy midterm comments point to lenient grading.

Format shift

Online students stress accommodations; .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Weekly readings, discussions, essays, and a but not crushing load.

Format shift

Online highlights weekly classmate talks and readings; .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Most call him caring and supportive; the main knock is communication lag and grade opacity.

Format shift

Online support stories are strong; one online review is very negative on communication.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Mix of essays, weekly discussion activities, and .

Format shift

; online emphasizes assignments and discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, not-too-difficult class and an easy midterm plus two essays.

Main concern

and Canvas uploads.

What students said

“he always help students to succeed in his class. However, he takes his time to answer e-mails and .”
MLAT22496

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online ETHST1 is mostly praised as accommodating with engaging readings; one student reports grade and communication problems.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“He is very accommodating and respectful.”
ETHST1
“Horrible. Its been 1.5 months and IDK what my grade is”
ETHST1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans assignments and an .

Easy midtermEssaysDiscussion activities

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment is described as .

Easy midtermTwo essays
“The and is the .”
MLAT22496

Online

, and assignments; no strict proctoring is described.

Engaging assignmentsWeekly classmate discussionsReadings important
“engaging assignments. ”
ETHST1
“gave me some extra time on a couple of assignments”
ETHST1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof Acevedo worked with me and gave me some extra time on a couple of assignments... and I learned alot”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (3 online, 1 in person), highlighting support and communication gaps. Credibility rating: Medium.

🤝 Supportive Flexibility

85/100

“He is very accommodating and respectful.”

📚 Reading-Centered Learning

70/100

“ and all the resources given were really interesting.”

📧 Communication Friction

30/100

“doesnt let students no whats going on”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • very accommodating and respectful
  • and I learned alot
  • always help students to succeed

Theme 2

📈 About Course Load

  • The and is the
  • engaging assignments
  • class is very interesting and not too difficult

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • takes his time to answer e-mails and
  • IDK what my grade is
  • syllabus says one thing and he does another

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews with mixed detail; themes of support but sample is small.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ETHST13 reviews
MLAT224961 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values