AI Rate Professor

History

Katie Graham

HIST101 · HISTORY7A · HIST2A · ENGLISH16A · HIST2B · HIS7 · HISTORY3 · 7A · HIST002B · HIST002 · HISTFRM1877 · HISTORY2A · HIST7A · HIST2 · HIST7B · EUROPCIV · HST2 · HISTORY7B · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are a serious history student willing to tolerate disorganization and heavy work.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnorganized lecturesOften lateKnows history deepHard testsAvoid if you can
  • Many students say she knows history but teaches in a .
  • , and hard quizzes or exams are recurring.
  • A minority love her for smart, engaging history if they want rigor; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Hard multiple-choice tests, trick questions, and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students repeatedly call the class hard, work-heavy, and full of dense or off-topic lecture material.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and one notes you have to be there to pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Would-take-again rate is zero among answered reviews and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

, and tough exams outweigh occasional open-note quiz mentions.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students report lots of and exams, and work that feels multi-unit heavy.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Deep subject knowledge is praised, but lateness, rants, and confusion define most experiences.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Mix of , and ; assessment is not assignment-only.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Long-running in-person history reviews lean negative on organization and clarity despite subject expertise.

Main concern

Lateness, rants off syllabus, hard assessments, and .

What students said

“ .”
HISTORY7A
“ !”
7A
“One of the . Loved her class!”
HIST101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are often described as hard or tricky even when open notes; not student-friendly overall.

Hard multiple choiceTrick questionsOpen-notes quizzes still hardLecture-heavy finals

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Hard multiple-choice exams and quizzes with trick questions; open-notes quizzes still difficult.

Multiple choice examsTrick questionsOpen-notes quizzesHeavy homework
“Her exams and ... her tests were hard.”
HIST7B
“ trick questions.”
HIS7

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 in-person reviews spanning many years on organization, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“You can tell she knows her history, but she isn?t so great at teaching it.”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“ !!”

📚 Workload Intensity

24/100

“there is a lot of work for this class, it should be worth 12 units”

🧠 Subject Knowledge

70/100

“Katie could write the book herself; but she didn't.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her lectures go off on
  • She is all over the place
  • Lectures are witty, engaging and oftentimes hilarious.

Theme 2

⏰ About Reliability

  • She's always late, missed multiple classes
  • Can't believe she's "employed" at Laney
  • She has tendencies to come in late

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she has A LOT of trick questions
  • Katie's class was difficult but fulfilling.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four in-person reviews across many years show consistent themes of expertise mixed with poor organization.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 56
1 out of 57

Course coverage

HIST7B4 reviews
7A2 reviews
HIST1012 reviews
HISTORY7A2 reviews
ENGLISH16A1 review
Show 13 more courses
EUROPCIV1 review
HIS71 review
HIST0021 review
HIST002B1 review
HIST21 review
HIST2A1 review
HIST2B1 review
HIST7A1 review
HISTFRM18771 review
HISTORY2A1 review
HISTORY31 review
HISTORY7B1 review
HST21 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2