AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

Kathleen Pappert

ESL · ESL223A · ESL215A · 223A215A · ESL223 · 223A · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want real ESL growth and ; do not expect an automatic A.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient MentorESL SpecialistLots of PapersStrict on AsCaring Lecturer
  • Most students praise her as one of the best ESL teachers who builds confidence and writing skill.
  • She often will not hand out easy As ; effort is expected.
  • One outlier criticizes off-topic political talk and heavy paper load.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Multiple notes that she will not give As and finals.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

ESL-focused, confidence-building teaching with mid difficulty ratings, not conceptual brain-burn.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, and most do not specify a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most students call her best choice for real English growth despite a few strong dissenters.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Students report she withholds As and .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

SO MANY PAPERS and lecture-heavy load appear repeatedly in tags and comments.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Seven of nine reviews are quality 5 for , and strong lectures.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Papers, essays, midterms, and ; .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person ESL students mostly call her thoughtful, funny, and highly effective, with some friction over politics and strict A policies.

Main concern

Heavy papers and reluctance to award As frustrate grade-focused students.

What students said

“She is one of the best ESL teachers at Laney College.”
223A
“SHE WONT GIVE OUT As ! If you .”
ESL223A
“She talked about political things in class a lot when I took her class”
ESL215A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Midterms and finals appear as papers graded by ESL teachers rather than high-tech proctored exams.

Paper-Based MidtermPaper-Based Final

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students mention mid-term and ; reviews do not prove webcam or Lockdown Browser use.

Paper MidtermPaper Final
“I got A on my mid-term and final ( Paper was graded by other ESL teacher, not her! )”
ESL223A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you . If you put your effort and wanna get an A, NOT THIS CLASS!”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She is one of the best ESL teachers at Laney College.”

⚖️

35/100

“SHE WONT GIVE OUT As !”

📝 Workload Intensity

32/100

“SO MANY PAPERS”

❤️ About Character

85/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is the .
  • She talked with and discussed the .
  • She usually make fun in the classes, and the smile on her face, always.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • SHE WONT GIVE OUT As !
  • If you put your effort and wanna get an A, NOT THIS CLASS!
  • SO MANY PAPERS

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • She talked about political things in class a lot
  • always bring Asia or Asian's problem, which is not related to the lecture.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Nine in-person reviews from 2013-2018 show consistent praise for teaching with and papers.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ESL215A3 reviews
ESL2 reviews
223A1 review
223A215A1 review
ESL2231 review
Show 1 more courses
ESL223A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1