AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Lysha Lewis

SOC1 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

and unclear standards make the class a high-risk choice.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo feedbackAwful experienceUnclear standardsDo not recommend
  • Students report .
  • Little learning is perceived despite doing the work.
  • Strongly advised against; single review calls teaching unfit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Doing all semester work still leaves grade outcome unknown until the end with .

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty rating is moderate; the core complaint is lack of .

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and says the professor should not be teaching.

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

and unforgiving even if work was submitted.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Student did work all semester; .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Described as awful with no learning and a recommendation that the professor should not teach.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Semester-long work is graded only at the end with .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person SOC1 review describes a semester of work with and little learning.

Main concern

if work meets standards until the end.

What students said

“Awful. You do your work all semester and .”
SOC1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Awful. You do your work all semester and . You don't really learn anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting lack of feedback and poor teaching. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“You don't really learn anything. Shouldn't be teaching.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“Awful. You do your work all semester and .”

📝

15/100

“At the very end you find out whether your work was good enough or not.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You don't really learn anything
  • Shouldn't be teaching

Theme 2

📝

  • At the very end you find out whether your work was good enough or not

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one negative review from 2017; but too few to generalize with confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

SOC11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values