AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Joseph Tanios

ECT12 · ECT211 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a caring, experienced engineering lecturer who actually helps students succeed.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringGreat LecturerInspirationalIndustry ExperiencedDown to Earth
  • caring, funny, and invested in education.
  • Strong industry experience in construction, project management, and codes.
  • , but lectures and support draw high praise online and in person.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades reported as A-, B, and B+ show solid but not free As; effort still matters.

Both online and expectations.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Average difficulty around 3.3 with content rooted in real construction and codes.

Online difficulty rated 3; in-person reviews range 3-4.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Every review that .

and in-person sections.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

and describe him as caring and inspiring.

and in-person comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

; grades span A- to B with respect and .

Format shift

Consistent across online and in-person.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

; focus is on lectures, participation, and real-world content.

Format shift

Similar moderate tone online and in person.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students highlight amazing lectures, industry experience, humor, and genuine care.

Format shift

Praise is strong in both formats.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Participation matters and picture.

Format shift

No format-specific assessment split stated.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

genuinely cares and is down to earth with amazing lectures.

Main concern

and difficulty can still hit mid-high.

What students said

“My favorite professor. He genuinely cares about his students and their education.”
ECT12
“down to earth and cares about his students. very experience individual!”
ECT12

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online student praised his construction expertise, clear lecturing, openness to viewpoints, and willingness to help.

Main concern

as mandatory even online.

What students said

“He is a hard working guy, great lecturer and easy to get a long with.”
ECT211

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

details.

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“My favorite professor. He genuinely cares about his students and their education.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews across online and in-person formats. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Student Care

92/100

“My favorite professor. He genuinely cares about his students and their education.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“great lecturer and easy to get a long with”

👍 Recommendation

96/100

“down to earth and cares about his students. very experience individual!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • great lecturer and easy to get a long with
  • Amazing lectures
  • and always likes to help others

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • genuinely cares about his students and their education
  • down to earth and cares about his students

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • hard working guy
  • participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Three detailed 2017 reviews agree on care and teaching quality, but sample size and age limit confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ECT122 reviews
ECT2111 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values