AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Scott Beaver

CHEM30A · CHEM1A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Only take if and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardInconsistent ExamsTest HeavyLots of HomeworkCaring but MixedLecture Heavy
  • Students split and calling teaching terrible.
  • .
  • Labs and study guides help, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

A B is achievable with book study and practice tests, but and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard intro chemistry difficulty with moderate conceptual load and lecture-heavy delivery.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory with little flexibility noted.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Two of and and exam traps.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

One B and ; feedback is fast but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Tagged lots of , and lecture heavy with substantial lab work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Ranges from and useful practice tests.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Exams and and homework.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person chemistry with mixed teaching quality: and solid labs, but whispery lectures and .

Main concern

and include material he said would not appear.

What students said

“avoid his class. exam.”
CHEM30A
“Scott is a mess. Luckily his class is pretty cut and paste.”
CHEM1A
“Dr. Scott cares for his students- he took the time to learn all of our names”
CHEM30A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes and often misaligned with practice materials, raising student stress.

Practice tests diverge from real examsSurprise exam contentTest heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and include material he said would not be tested.

Mismatched practice examsSurprise exam itemsTest heavy
“ exam.”
CHEM30A
“things he say that ”
CHEM30A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“avoid his class. exam.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews spanning 2016, highlighting teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Teaching Quality

42/100

“his skills of teaching is terrible.”

⚠️

30/100

“ exam.”

❤️ Student Care

70/100

“Dr. Scott cares for his students- he took the time to learn all of our names”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his skills of teaching is terrible.
  • Scott is a mess.
  • he does a decent job explaining what you need to know.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • exam.
  • His study guides are copies of the .
  • and are a lot like the tests.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Dr. Scott cares for his students
  • constantly gave us the opportunity for
  • he grades and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews from 2016 with mixed detail and no recent data lowers confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM30A2 reviews
CHEM1A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1