AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ljay Citron

STAT · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Thin single-review evidence looks positive for STAT, but treat claims as low-confidence until more students chime in.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyBest teacher praiseLimited evidenceModerate difficultyLaney STAT
  • Only one short positive review exists from 2015.
  • Student called teaching the best at Laney with quality 4/5.
  • Difficulty rated moderate with no grade or workload detail.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

No grade or effort-to-A detail; only a mid difficulty rating supports a middle-ground guess.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty was rated 3/5 with no comments on pace or concept load.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Attendance policy was not stated in the only review.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

The lone student strongly praised teaching quality at Laney.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, so fairness stays neutral.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

review.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Student called Citron the best teacher at Laney with a 4/5 quality rating.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One in-person STAT review raves that Citron is the and moderate difficulty.

Main concern

Extremely thin sample with .

What students said

“ !!!!!”
STAT

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

in-person review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching praise. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“ !!!!!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“ !!!!!”

📚 Course Difficulty

50/100

“Course DIFFICULTY rating: 3”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • !!!!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 3

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

One short 2015 review with no grades, tags, or policy detail yields low confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

STAT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values