AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kelvin Jew

MATH1 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; the single contradictory review makes Kelvin Jew a high-risk unknown.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery Hard MathLow Quality RatingSparse FeedbackSingle ReviewHigh Difficulty
  • Only one review with a quality rating of 1 and difficulty of 5.
  • The comment body is just the word good, which conflicts with the low rating.
  • with almost no detail.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Difficulty is maxed at 5 and quality is 1, so an A likely requires heavy effort with little support.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Difficulty rating of 5 marks the content as extremely challenging.

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

A quality score of 1 with no supporting praise beyond one vague word is not a recommendation.

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

High difficulty and very low .

Format shift

All .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Difficulty 5 implies a heavy academic load even without workload details.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Quality rating is 1; the one-word comment good does not outweigh the numerical signal.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

No information on .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One in-person MATH1 review scores quality 1 and difficulty 5 with only the word good as comment text.

Main concern

Almost no usable narrative; ratings imply a very hard, low-quality experience.

What students said

“good”
MATH1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“good”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 sparse in-person review, relying mainly on quality and difficulty ratings. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

18/100

“good”

🔥 Course Difficulty

12/100

“good”

⚠️ Thin Evidence

15/100

“good”

Theme 1

📝

  • good

Theme 2

📈 About Ratings Signal

  • quality rated 1
  • difficulty rated 5

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

15/100

Evidence confidence

Single 2014 review with a contradictory one-word comment and no grade or .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values