AI Rate Professor

Economics

Cheryl Mortimer

ECON002 · ECON1 · ECONMACR · MICRO1111 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

if , but beware inconsistent tests and possible bias.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging summer lecturerNo textbook needed if notes solidMood-dependent grading riskOddly written tests
  • Many summer/Econ , and a cake walk if
  • A minority report bias, unorganized lectures, and
  • No book needed if you attend and study notes, but silly mistakes and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many call it easy with notes, but and bias make an A hard or impossible.

; mixed ease of A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Average difficulty is low and several students call content simple or a cake walk with notes.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Success advice is to attend every class and if not labeled mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Four strong recommends outweigh two avoid reviews, especially for summer sessions.

Mixed in-person only; positive summer reviews dominate.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Some finish with A/B and call tests not hard; others claim bias and .

Format shift

Mixed in-person only evidence.

Workload

Light

75/100

No book needed if ; workload centers on attending, notes, and studying for tests.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

; minority say unorganized, biased, and moody.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

; book is optional if lecture notes are solid.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Most in-person students find her lively and easy when they attend and ; a vocal minority reports bias and .

Main concern

Oddly written or and alleged grade bias can punish students who dislike her style.

What students said

“NO needed to buy the book,just attend every single class, take good notes, study the notes for .”
ECON1
“This class is a cake walk if you read the book.”
ECON002
“Its just . Her tests are oddly wrtten so its impossible to get an A.”
ECON1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests often follow lectures more than the book and .

Lecture-based testsOddly written questionsSilly-mistake traps

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

written, and reward careful note study.

Lecture-based testsOddly written questionsSilly-mistake traps
“ but very easy to make silly mistake”
ECON1
“ so its impossible to get an A.”
ECON1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“NO needed to buy the book,just attend every single class, take good notes, study the notes for .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, balancing strong summer praise with two harsh bias and test complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She was every lively, engaging, and welcoming. You have to pay attention and .”

⚠️ Test Risk

48/100

“ so its impossible to get an A.”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“ if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She knows and , and I love her teaching style.
  • She was every lively, engaging, and welcoming.
  • She makes learning Microecon simple to follow and understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class is a cake walk if you read the book.
  • but very easy to make silly mistake
  • so its impossible to get an A.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fairness Concerns

  • She is extremely biased towards students and will reduce your grade if she does not like you.
  • BIASED! I took Econ 1 this spring and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six older in-person reviews with a clear 4-positive vs 2-negative split and decent detail, but no recent grades.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ECON0022 reviews
ECON12 reviews
ECONMACR1 review
MICRO11111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values