AI Rate Professor

Business

Ronald Hollis

MSVN60 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can succeed with almost no guidance or feedback.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsive to emailNo clear directionAvoids direct answersLast-minute feedback only
  • Single review rates quality 1 with high difficulty
  • Student says emails ignored and questions dodged in person and online
  • share a test grade

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

High difficulty rating and zero guidance make earning a strong grade feel like hard work with little support.

Single in-person review only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty rated 4 and student reports no direction or .

Single in-person review only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The sole review is entirely negative about communication, direction, and feedback.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

No grade transparency and refusal to share a .

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

; main pain is lack of direction rather than assignment volume.

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Described as horrible for dodging questions, ignoring email, and giving no course direction.

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

65/100

A , but .

Format shift

Single in-person review only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only in-person review describes unresponsiveness, dodged questions, and .

Main concern

No direction and .

What students said

“Horrible. when asked a question”
MSVN60

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; only opacity around test grades is mentioned.

Opaque test grades

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence only shows the professor would not answer a .

Opaque test grades
“Won't even answer a simple question ?"”
MSVN60

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible. when asked a question, then blames students for not asking when they did in person AND .”

Voice snapshot generated from 1 in-person review focused on unresponsiveness and . Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Communication Failure

12/100

“ when asked a question”

📉

15/100

“No direction, no hints on how you are doing in the class until the last day.”

👎 Overall Verdict

10/100

“Horrible.”

Theme 1

📧 About Communication

  • always beats about the bush when asked a question
  • blames students for not asking when they did in person AND

Theme 2

📉

  • No direction, no hints on how you are doing in the class until the last day.
  • Won't even answer a simple question ?"

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2013 review with strong negative detail but no corroboration or grade distribution.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MSVN601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values