AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Victor Alexeev

MATHLAB · MATH202 · MATH250 · MATH2 · MATH201 · MATH251 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if and handle a blunt classroom style.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing personalityHelpful if you seek him outStrict attendanceGenerous partial creditStrong accent
  • and rude condescending instructor.
  • rule in one section.
  • Students who read the book and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Generous credit for shown work helps, but and .

All evidence is from the nine in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Content is doable with the book, though some say he overcomplicates precalculus topics.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

16/100

One review states three absences equal a drop, and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; others call him the worst and report him to the dean.

Recommendation is split across the in-person sample.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Students note and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Weekly quizzes and but not extreme.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

Praise for help and humor is offset by repeated complaints about rudeness and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and exams all matter according to student comments.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and and insulting, with homework and weekly quizzes as the backbone.

Main concern

Rudeness reports and some students.

What students said

“Alexeev is concerned with students grasping the material but if they come to class or not.”
MATH202
“He was insulting and rude to everyone in the class”
MATH251
“he'll give you credit as long as you show work”
MATH2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and exams reward shown work; .

Weekly quizzesShow-your-work creditHomework driven

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Weekly quizzes and shown.

Weekly quizzesShow-your-work credit
“he'll give you credit as long as you show work”
MATH2
“He has a quiz every week, 3 absents = drop, and .”
MATH202

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“For those that are in dear need of help, this is the guy to go to!”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews capturing a . Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️ Split Teaching Reviews

46/100

“Wretched! He was insulting and rude to everyone in the class”

📗

62/100

“so as long as you READ THE BOOK and do the exercises, you'll do fine”

🚫

16/100

“3 absents = drop, and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Help and Humor

  • relaxed and very helpful teacher
  • Cracks jokes while explaining well
  • great sense of humor and a relaxed classroom

Theme 2

😠 About Tone Problems

  • really rude and condescending for no reason
  • insulting and rude to everyone
  • makes things more complicated than it has to

Theme 3

📐 About How to Pass

  • Just read the book and do the homework
  • he'll give you credit as long as you show work
  • doesn't even assign hw and expects you to do it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews from 2008-2011 give a but are old and split almost evenly.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH23 reviews
MATH2022 reviews
MATH2011 review
MATH2501 review
MATH2511 review
Show 1 more courses
MATHLAB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values