AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Forough Hashemi

EET226 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; poor teaching, time disrespect, and communication failures make the class a bad deal.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor English communicationLies about hybrid formatNo respect for student timeLots of homeworkDoes not answer emails
  • Teaching and English communication are rated very poorly
  • Misrepresented course as hybrid despite online catalog listing
  • and lecture load with ignored emails

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Difficulty is maxed out with and papers, and no path to an easy A is described.

Evidence comes only from one in-person EET226 review.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Student rated difficulty 5 with and poor instruction.

Evidence comes only from one in-person EET226 review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and the hybrid claim further forced in-person presence.

Evidence comes only from one in-person EET226 review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Quality 1, would-take-again not positive, and comments urge strong avoidance.

Evidence comes only from one in-person EET226 review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

No evidence of leniency; high difficulty and workload dominate the grade picture.

Format shift

In-person only; single review.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Tags and comments cite lots of , and lecture-heavy classes.

Format shift

In-person only; single review.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Student says she teaches as poorly as she speaks English and classes are boring.

Format shift

In-person only; single review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Lots of homework and exams.

Format shift

In-person only; single review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person experience described as boring, heavy, and hostile after the professor misled students about hybrid format.

Main concern

Professor lied about format, blames students, and ignores emails.

What students said

“she lied to her class about it being a hybrid when the course was listed as 100% online on the catalog.”
EET226

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Forough teaches about as well as she speaks English. Not good. Boring classes, and even worse, she has no respect for student's time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting teaching failure and trust issues. Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Disaster

12/100

“Forough teaches about as well as she speaks English. Not good.”

⏰ Time Disrespect

15/100

“she has no respect for student's time.”

📧 Communication Failure

10/100

“Doesn't answer emails.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • teaches about as well as she speaks English
  • Boring classes

Theme 2

⚠️ About Trust Issues

  • lied to her class about it being a hybrid
  • blamed us for being unwilling to learn
  • Doesn't answer emails

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

One detailed negative review is vivid but uncorroborated by other students.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

EET2261 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1