AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Anthony O'Regan

POLI2 · PLSCI01 · POL005POL007 · POLSCI7 · POL7 · PLSCI1 · POLSC07 · PLOISCI1 · PLS002 · POLISCI001 · POLISCI7 · POLSC007 · POLSCI001 · POLI001 · POLI7 · POL2POL7 · POLSC002 · POLISCI2 · POL001 · PLYSC1 · 377 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
26.26%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you need this specific poli-sci section and can tolerate unforgiving deadlines and picky writing grades.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh tough graderAI accusationsNo extensionsPaper and quiz heavyLow empathy reports
  • Most students warn of , and AI plagiarism accusations.
  • Workload centers , and .
  • A minority say effort yields learning and , but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

16/100

Students say As , and one misstep can destroy the grade.

Both online and ; online adds AI zero complaints.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Material itself is college-level poli-sci reading and writing, .

Online emphasizes tricky quizzes and vague paper instructions; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

68/100

Many online and as not mandatory, though deadlines are rigid.

Online more often optional attendance; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

and most recent reviews urge students to pick anyone else.

online minority defending him.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

; zeros, no EC, and AI accusations define the experience.

Format shift

and in-person sections.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

, and weekly quizzes create high load.

Format shift

Workload complaints are especially loud online but also common in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Few praise deep learning; many report no help, condescension, and little teaching beyond materials.

Format shift

Online is harsher on unhelpfulness; older in-person notes better lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and weekly quizzes rather than one pure mode.

Format shift

Online details discussions and papers most; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and unfair, with some older praise for strong lectures.

Main concern

, and expensive required books.

What students said

“he assigned a lot of homework and accused me of using AI and gave me a 0 for most of my assignments”
POL001
“No matter how much work you put in, you will not get an A.”
PLSCI01
“ and essays.”
POLISCI7

Remote format

Online

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and AI flags.

Main concern

Zeros for technical or medical issues and little recovery path tank GPAs.

What students said

“He and yet quick to accuse everyone of using AI.”
PLYSC1
“I cannot accept late submissions, deadline has already passed”
POL001
“He does NOT give any and offers no remakes for .”
POLI7

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

timed or .

Timed quizzesHomemade quiz questionsWriting-heavy gradingNo late workAI scrutiny

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe tough discussions, timed homemade quizzes, and .

Timed quizzesDiscussion heavyTough papersNo extra credit
“ that HE has made up”
PLSCI01
“No extensions for emergency, no .”
PLSCI01

Online

Online students report timed or weekly quizzes, high-stakes papers, and AI-related zeros without remakes.

Weekly quizzesWriting assignmentsNo late submissionsAI accusations
“I cannot accept late submissions, deadline has already passed”
POLISCI001
“ .”
PLOISCI1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you care .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, emphasizing harsh grading themes with limited counterpoints. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Level

24/100

“I highly and .”

⚖️

14/100

“ . Heavily unfair.”

📝 Assessment Stress

32/100

“If you mess up on any of the good grade in the class.”

🎯 Minority Positive View

55/100

“If you put in the effort, you will succeed.”

Theme 1

📉 About Grades and Fairness

  • accused me of using AI and gave me a 0
  • No
  • will hardly ever give an A

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • So many papers

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support

  • Doesn't help students
  • no sympathy
  • refused to meet with me over zoom or in person

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

377

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with strong and low recommendation, spanning years and formats.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5163
4 out of 550
3 out of 540
2 out of 531
1 out of 593

Course coverage

PLSCI0110 reviews
PLOISCI15 reviews
POL0015 reviews
POLSC0074 reviews
PLS0023 reviews
Show 16 more courses
1012 reviews
POL005POL0072 reviews
POL2POL72 reviews
POL72 reviews
POLI0012 reviews
POLISCI0012 reviews
POLSCI0012 reviews
PLSCI11 review
PLYSC11 review
POLI21 review
POLI71 review
POLISCI21 review
POLISCI71 review
POLSC0021 review
POLSC071 review
POLSCI71 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 6 · A- 2

B range

11

B+ 2 · B 7 · B- 2

C range

7

C+ 3 · C 3 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

6

F 6

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 7 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1