AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Denice Labertew

SOC12 · SOC001 · SOC31 · SOC1 · 666SOC · SOC2 · SOC01 · SOC21 · SOC4 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
59.09%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Usable for an A if you do modules and memorize study guides, but skip if you want strong teaching and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterStudy guides match testsGroup projects heavyPolarizing lecturesParticipation requiredLots of short papers
  • Grades can be easy with and steady Canvas work
  • inspiring for some, boring or rude for others
  • Group projects, reading, and delayed grade

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many and , so an A is reachable with steady work.

Both formats report passable grades; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content difficulty is moderate with reading, papers, and group work rather than hard concepts.

Online modules feel fine for some; and projects add load.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Frequent tags and comments say participate, attend, and skip and you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; many others urge avoidance over teaching style and communication.

Online is split; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Study guides often match tests and if work is submitted.

Format shift

Online communication issues can hide grades; .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Journals, blogs, discussions, group project, and reading add up though individual tasks are short.

Format shift

Online has module work; and group projects.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some find lectures interesting and caring; others call her boring, passive-aggressive, or unresponsive.

Format shift

Polarization is strongest in person; .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Mix of , and final.

Format shift

Similar pattern online and in person with more group work noted in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

identical study guides and strong dislike for style, movies, and attitude.

Main concern

Group work, perceived bias or rudeness, and uneven engagement.

What students said

“Study guide is identical to the midterm and final so that is a plus!”
SOC001
“Literally the . Doesn't teach, she instead ops for Netflix specials.”
SOC21
“Denice Labertew is the .”
SOC1

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and grade-friendly; others slam non-response and no running grades.

Main concern

and grades not posted until late.

What students said

“She doesn't give you a grade the whole class so you can't check how you're doing in the class.”
SOC1
“Prof. Labertew is fantastic; she'll ”
SOC001
“You basically walk through modules, and it's good.”
SOC001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are student-friendly because study guides often match the test questions exactly.

Study guide identical to examMidterm and finalEssay questions from book

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals frequently use study guides identical to the exams.

Identical study guidesBook-based examsEssay questions
“They are exactly the same as the exams! Just memorize them & get an A”
SOC001
“she gave us study guides before the test and put the same questions on the test.”
SOC1

Online

Online reviews give little specific proctoring detail; modules and .

ModulesAssignmentsFeedback when responsive
“You basically walk through modules, and it's good.”
SOC001
“Just do the assignments and you should do well.”
SOC21

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Denice Labertew is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews capturing a polarized easy-A vs poor-teaching split. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Split

52/100

“Lectures were very interesting & relatable. Never boring.”

👍 Recommendation Depends

52/100

“ ”

📈

80/100

“Study guide is identical to the midterm and final so that is a plus!”

⚠️ Communication Risk

35/100

“ if she does respond it's 3 days after the due date.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • conversational cadence during lectures
  • very boring class
  • she instead ops for Netflix specials

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy to get an A
  • study guides before the test and put the same questions on the test
  • Overall an easy class

Theme 3

⚠️ About Work and Groups

  • GROUP PROJECTS
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • Don't bother if you can't work in groups

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

35 reviews with but high polarization and uneven detail across years lowers consistency score.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 57
3 out of 56
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

SOC0019 reviews
SOC219 reviews
SOC18 reviews
SOC012 reviews
011 review
Show 6 more courses
15891 review
666SOC1 review
SOC121 review
SOC21 review
SOC311 review
SOC41 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 3 · A 9

B range

6

B+ 4 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1