AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hasmik Mkrtchyan

MATH113 · MATH125 · MATH060 · MATH245 · MATH115 · MATH120 · MATH110 · MATH262 · MATH260 · 45 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
73.68%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you will attend, use reviews, and want a caring teacher; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing math instructorExtra credit heavyAttendance mattersReview sheets helpAccent divide
  • Many students credit her caring help, review sheets, and for passing math.
  • A sizable minority call her disorganized, impatient, or hard to understand due to accent and pace.
  • Showing up and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

, and reviews help, but and hard material still require real work for an A.

Limited online sample reports easier As; most .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Lower-level classes can feel manageable, but intermediate algebra through calc is often called challenging.

Online MATH245 comments sound clearer; in-person difficulty varies widely by course level.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Many reviews say you must attend lectures and that skipping kills your chance to pass.

Attendance pressure is mainly documented in in-person reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

, but negative reviews are intense enough that fit depends on learning style.

Online sample is uniformly positive; in-person opinions are polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and dropped scores soften grades, yet several call her a tough or .

Format shift

and ; online sample leans generous.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

MyMathLab homework, classwork, and ride.

Format shift

Workload comments .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Strong care and review culture for many students is offset by accent, pace, and patience complaints for others.

Format shift

Online praise is consistent; in-person quality is split.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Tests, quizzes, and review sheets drive .

Format shift

and pop quizzes; online and passing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews split between gem-of-a-teacher praise and , and toughness.

Main concern

Communication friction and uneven lecture clarity frustrate many, especially weaker math students.

What students said

“She is an absolute gem of a teacher and she really cares about her students.”
MATH260
“ . She is the .”
MATH110
“I feel that she made calc 2 as easy as calc 2 can get.”
MATH262

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Small online sample , and high grades in MATH245/260.

Main concern

Only three online reviews, so online experience is less proven.

What students said

“She is an amazing professor, she really cares about her students.”
MATH245
“Amazing professor, so caring and truly wants you to pass.”
MATH260

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and described as fair but still require study.

Review sheetsPop quizzesDropped lowest testMyMathLab homeworkFair tests

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, with some pop quizzes and occasional dropped scores.

Review sheetsPop quizzesDropped lowest testMyMathLab
“Provides lots of opportunities for and .”
MATH262
“She gave us review sheets that helped us a .”
MATH115

Online

Online reviews ; success is tied to paying attention and homework.

Homework focusLecture attention
“You just need to pay attention and you will pass her class.”
MATH245

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I wish all math classes were taught by her because . She is an absolute gem of a teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 45 reviews, balancing strong praise with sharp criticism. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Lectures are understandable and well formatted. If you study for ! ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

70/100

“ .”

⚠️ Polarizing Experience

40/100

“ . She is the worst teacher I have ever had, very rude.”

🎁 Support &

75/100

“ . Yes she has an accent but it is easy to understand.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and understandably.
  • as well.
  • and makes sure no one is getting left in the dust.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It is honestly an easy A if and do the .
  • unless you are willing to put in a lot of effort.
  • She made calc 2 as easy as calc 2 can get.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She truly cares about her students.
  • She's a cool chill professor. Nice, caring and wants her students to pass.
  • Very difficult teacher to work with.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

45

Recent reviews read by the AI

45

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-five reviews over many years give a robust but polarized picture; online slice is too small to generalize alone.

Inside 45 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 56
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH11513 reviews
MATH12511 reviews
MATH2457 reviews
MATH2606 reviews
MATH2622 reviews
Show 6 more courses
1151 review
32451 review
MATH0601 review
MATH1101 review
MATH1131 review
MATH1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 6 · A 13

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1