AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

(Andy) Andranik Pogosyan

MATH263 · MATH259 · MATH115 · MATH265 · MATH261 · MATH260H · MATH238 · MATH262 · MATH0125 · MATH260 · 90 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
54.9%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you , and use the drop-and-extra-credit safety net; skip if you need slow, hand-holding lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest HeavyExtra CreditDrops Lowest ExamFast-Paced LecturesPolarizing
  • Grade is almost entirely exams, but and adds .
  • Lectures move fast; while others say you teach yourself.
  • yet usually only a small share of the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many As come from dropped exams, partial credit, and , but .

Nearly all grade-path evidence is in person; online comments rarely detail how easy an A is.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Calculus content plus rapid coverage makes the material intellectually demanding for most students.

Both formats describe fast pacing; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

because missing a day leaves you far behind.

and you will not pass; online sample is too small to change that.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

; fans love the safety nets while critics hate the self-teaching load.

Recommendation split is driven by in-person calculus sections; and few.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

64/100

Drops lowest exam, partial credit, formula sheets sometimes, and frequent .

Format shift

Leniency claims .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report small grade share.

Format shift

Heavy HW comments are consistent in person; online notes emphasize depth of .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and hard-to-hear lectures for others.

Format shift

Polarized in-person teaching tone; online .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Course grade is driven by multiple exams and a .

Format shift

Test-heavy .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many call him merciful with practice exams and softly, and leaves you on your own.

Main concern

Fast lectures and or struggle with exams.

What students said

“Exams make up 90 percent of your grade, but he is a , and gives practice exams that are very similar to the .”
MATH262
“UNBELIEVABLE amount of HW that was only 10% of your grade. Only grade that matters were the tests.”
MATH259
“Does not teach nor lecture. Reads theorems and formulas straight from the book and speedruns through examples.”
MATH262

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

lectures move fast, study guides help, and you must already know prerequisites.

Main concern

and support.

What students said

“He goes pretty fast in his lectures and assumes that you know the basics of math from previous classes.”
MATH259
“He is not very detail-oriented in his notes and is not able to break down examples and doing.”
MATH261

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Timed in-person exams dominate, eased by practice exams, drops, and .

Practice exams similar to real examsDrop lowest examExtra credit on examsFormula sheets sometimesIn-person timed tests

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and test-heavy but and partial credit.

Practice examsDrop lowest examPartial creditExtra credit questions
“Gives a ton of and includes and gives so much extra time for exams.”
MATH263
“ and .”
MATH261

Online

Online reviews ; they mainly stress study guides and hard specific questions.

Study guides reflect exams
“The study guides are so helpful and reflect the exam.”
MATH259

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Exams make up 90 percent of your grade, but he is a , and gives practice exams that are very similar to the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (2 online, 48 in , and polarized teaching quality. Credibility rating: High.

📝

64/100

“ ! Gives a ton of partial credit on every exam and includes .”

⚡

40/100

“He has no lesson plan. Does not teach nor lecture. Reads theorems and formulas straight from the book.”

📚

28/100

“UNBELIEVABLE amount of HW that was only 10% of your grade. Only grade that matters were the tests.”

👍

55/100

“Do not hesistate to take this class with Professor Pogosyan, truly a great professor! He also gives !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and demonstrates the process of solving problems often.
  • He has a low tone voice which makes him hard to hear.
  • You are basically on your own.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It is possible to get an A but be prepared to work hard.
  • .
  • He is also a very merciful professor unlike many others.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support & Character

  • He will answer any questions you have.
  • Andy doesn't really care about answering your questions he wants you to know already.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

90

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews spanning many years and courses show consistent themes despite a strong love-hate split.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 536
4 out of 516
3 out of 511
2 out of 510
1 out of 518

Course coverage

MATH26113 reviews
MATH26211 reviews
MATH25910 reviews
MATH2605 reviews
MATH01253 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH2633 reviews
MATH2652 reviews
MATH1151 review
MATH2381 review
MATH260H1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 4 · A 14 · A- 1

B range

9

B 9

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

14

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 7 · Rather not say 2