AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Farrel Broslawsky

PLSCI5 · HUM1 · POLISCI1 · POLISCI01 · POLITICTHEORY · HIST11 · AMERICANHISTOR · POLISCI5 · HUMANITIES01 · POLI005 · HIST12 · POLSC005 · HUMAN1 · HUM001 · POLSCI005 · POL05 · POLSCI05 · POLISCI2 · POL5 · PHILOSOPHY · POLSCI5 · 105 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
95%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can; most students call him a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLife-Changing LecturesInspirationalEasy PapersCaring MentorTake Before He Retires
  • Students call him a rare, life-changing professor who builds critical thinking.
  • Grades often rest on doable papers or .
  • Attendance and structure vary, but care, humor, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Many report Easy A via doable papers and and try.

Almost all grade-ease evidence is in person; the single online review also reported an A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content can be dense or theoretical, but and .

In-person reviews dominate; online also notes dense but supported content.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

as not mandatory, yet participation and discussion clearly help.

In-person comments mix optional and mandatory notes; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

About 95% would take again, with constant gem, life-changing, and .

Recommendation strength is high in person and in the single online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

Students say he grades fairly and generously on papers when effort and understanding show.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Typical load is a and discussion, not endless busywork.

Format shift

Workload comments .

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Reviews repeatedly , and transformative across decades.

Format shift

Excellence is consistent in person; the online review is also strongly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Grades usually come from papers, discussions, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students overwhelmingly praise inspiring lectures, caring mentorship, and .

Main concern

A few note long lectures, tangents, or political leanings as possible friction.

What students said

“Farrel was the else”
PHILOSOPHY
“DO NOT miss the !”
POLSCI005
“Easy A, WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR !”
HUM1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The one online review calls him a and strongly recommends the class.

Main concern

Content can be dense even when support is strong.

What students said

“Professor Broslawsky is a true gem - engaging, brilliant and genuinely cares about students.”
POLSCI005

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments often are take-home essays or .

Take-Home EssaysExam Questions SharedPapers Over TestsDiscussion Based

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and essay-style assessments.

Take-Home MidtermTake-Home Final EssayQuestions Given Ahead
“ and . Easy A.”
POL05
“ . He lets you have the ”
PLSCI5
“ and he gives the questions before the test”
POL5

Online

The single online review does not detail exam mechanics beyond a positive, low-difficulty experience.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I mean this insecurely when I say this professor changed my life. He opened up my eyes to new ways of seeing and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and near-universal recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Quality

93/100

“Farrel was the else, and I've taken a lot of college courses.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“ ! It's fantastic & the professor might retire, soon.”

📝

84/100

“Our grades were based on 3 papers that were 100% doable and not hard.”

❤️ Student Care

90/100

“He is exceptionally supportive of his students. I promise that !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • No one teaches like him!
  • Amazing lectures
  • He really makes you think and not just regurgitate what the book says.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A
  • and
  • Just show up and participate in the discussion

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • A true gem of a man
  • He truly cares about each student
  • He is a rare and needed human.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

105

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning many years show strong consistency on inspiration, care, and recommendation with rich detail.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 569
4 out of 517
3 out of 510
2 out of 55
1 out of 54

Course coverage

HUM19 reviews
POL054 reviews
POLISCI54 reviews
POLSCI0054 reviews
AMERICANHISTOR3 reviews
Show 17 more courses
HUMANITIES013 reviews
POL53 reviews
HUMAN12 reviews
PHILOSOPHY2 reviews
PLSCI52 reviews
POLI0052 reviews
POLISCI012 reviews
31811 review
HIST111 review
HIST121 review
HUM0011 review
POLISCI11 review
POLISCI21 review
POLITICTHEORY1 review
POLSC0051 review
POLSCI051 review
POLSCI51 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

34

A+ 9 · A 23 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1