AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Adam Littig

MATH227STATS · STATS227 · MATH115227 · CLASS · MATH227 · MATH260 · MATH275 · 131 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
34.85%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you can dedicate many and will use office hours; otherwise choose a lighter workload professor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHomework avalancheTest heavy statsPolarizing math teacherOwn textbook requiredDo the work or fail
  • frequent multi-assignment weeks and .
  • Students who keep up with homework and office hours often pass or get As; those who fall behind describe failing or incomplete grades.
  • Online and in-person both demand heavy effort, with extra friction from his workbook, StatDisk, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

As are possible with and study, but many report Cs, Fs, incompletes, or withdrawals when effort slips.

Online has both A+ success stories and failure warnings; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Statistics and related math content are widely described as hard, fast later in term, and unforgiving if foundations slip.

Both formats call the material difficult; online adds self-teaching complaints for calc-based or Zoom sections.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Many sections require class or Zoom presence, and tags like skip class you will not pass appear often, though some online terms are looser.

; some online reviews say Zoom is optional if work is done.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

; dedicated students praise him, but more voices warn of overwhelm and poor fit.

Positive online transfer-success stories exist, yet .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

36/100

Tough grader tags are common; little margin for error though .

Format shift

Online and ; a few online students note end-of-term boosts for consistent work.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Multiple assignments per class meeting, long problem sets, and .

Format shift

Workload complaints dominate both formats; online often adds 6-12 tasks per week.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

, and supportive, others say explanations, handwriting, and .

Format shift

Online reviews more often attack handwriting and Zoom teaching; in-person reviews focus on pace and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Exams and as preparation and sometimes daily points.

Format shift

One online review cites exams at about 80 percent; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person sections are lecture-heavy with daily or , and ; praise focuses on care and clarity for hard workers, while many warn of no work-life balance.

Main concern

and exams that sometimes feel mismatched to lectures.

What students said

“the amount of . If you take his classes, be prepared to spend several nights doing hours of homework.”
MATH227
“If you actually do the HW, attend the lectures, and pay attention, you'll pass this class.”
MATH227STATS
“Just don't take this class periodt”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online stats and math sections pile on weekly homework, Zoom or recorded lectures, and high-stakes exams; success stories stress doing every assignment while , and .

Main concern

, and exams that can dominate the grade.

What students said

“Exams are disproportionately weighted (80% of the grade) and are poorly structured”
MATH227
“ but NOT proctored.”
227
“Take this class if you need to pass a math class in order to transfer, you will definitely pass with him even if you are horrible at math”
MATH227STATS

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are difficult and high-stakes; online midterms have been described as timed but not proctored, while tools like StatDisk can help when allowed.

Test heavyTimed midtermsStatDisk allowed on some testsFinal heavily weightedNot always proctored online

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and cumulative-feeling, with little grading margin and as exam prep.

Difficult examsTest heavyHomework as study guideTough grader
“ and .”
227
“Don't just do the HW. Use the HW as a study guide for the exams.”
MATH275

Online

Online midterms are timed and often not proctored; and StatDisk is sometimes allowed.

Timed midtermsNot proctoredStatDisk on testsFinal huge weight
“ but NOT proctored.”
227
“At first I did not like that he used StatDisk, but once I figured out he lets you use it on .”
MATH227STATS
“ grade.”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do not get intimidated by the work!! just ask questions he is more than happy to help! I pulled through the end of the semester and got a B!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (27 online, 23 in , and polarized teaching quality. Credibility rating: High.

📚

18/100

“the amount of .”

🎯 Teaching Split

48/100

“The and makes even difficult topics easy to understand.”

📉 Failure Risk

30/100

“You will fail.”

💪 Reward For Effort

60/100

“as long as you keep up with .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Chill and patient instructor.
  • He is so terrible at explaining things and has the handwriting of a 5-year-old.
  • If you ask a question he will go in-depth and make sure you really understand the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Statistics is hard, and this teacher gives a lot of HW
  • Exams are disproportionately weighted (80% of the grade)
  • There is little margin for , but he does make it fair.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload Friction

  • You HAVE to buy the textbook.
  • He is selling his own books to us
  • All of the , so there is no reminder to do assignments.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

131

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across online and and polarization patterns.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 554
4 out of 515
3 out of 513
2 out of 517
1 out of 533

Course coverage

MATH22719 reviews
22710 reviews
MATH227STATS10 reviews
MATH2604 reviews
CLASS2 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH2752 reviews
STATS2272 reviews
MATH1152271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 7 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

6

C+ 1 · C 4 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 3 · Not sure yet 7