Nazli Saliminejad

PSYCH003 · PSYCH001 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 62/100
RMP rating: 3.8/5
Take again: 69.23%
Difficulty: 2.8

The decision

Prefer her in person if you will attend and read; online quality varies a lot by section.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture heavyGet ready to readCaring in personExtra creditInconsistent online

, and doable if they show up and read.
, and harsh regrading.
Course is reading- and lecture-heavy with pop quizzes and unit work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many earn As or , and finishing unit work, but organization and .

In person feels more doable with show-up-and-work; and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

58/100

Intro psych content is manageable, but , and .

; online sometimes becomes textbook-and-exam only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

, while several online reviews say it was not.

In person leans mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

About two-thirds would take her and mixed online experiences.

In-person recommendations are warmer; online has both high praise and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and , but tough-grader and regrading complaints pull fairness down.

Format shift

is common in person; online has more tough-grader reports.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Regular reading, unit quizzes, discussions, and lecture notes keep the load steady rather than light.

Format shift

Both formats require substantial reading; online may swap lectures for more textbook work.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Caring and knowledgeable in many sections, but organization and lecture clarity are inconsistent, especially online.

Format shift

In-person teaching is generally stronger; online quality swings from excellent to poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and exams all matter.

Format shift

Online often centers weekly paragraphs, quizzes, and exams; in person is more lecture and unit work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students mostly describe a , and on-time work lead to solid grades.

Main concern

, and pop quizzes can overwhelm unprepared students.

What students said

“Her class is so easy if you just show up and do the work.”
PSYCH001

“she does teach the material quite quick so you WILL feel overwhelmed.”
PSYCH001

“as long as you show up and do the work on time you'll be fine.”
PSYCH001

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews split between fair, interactive sections and frustrating ones with , textbook-only learning, and .

Main concern

Some online sections lack lectures and after the fact.

What students said

“Doesn't do lectures for online class, you just read the textbook and .”
PSYCH003

“My grade was done and she went back to review my grades and gave me a 0 in what was already a good grade.”
PSYCH003

“ and .”
PSYCH003

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and unit quizzes are usually described as fair when prep matches lectures or readings, with some pop quizzes.

Unit quizzesOnline quizzesFair exams reportedPop quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and online unit quizzes, with occasional pop quizzes.

Unit quizzes onlinePop quizzesLecture-heavy prep

“a ”
PSYCH001

“Beware of pop quizzes”
PSYCH001

Online

, and exams; fairness is mixed and some say wrong answers are never shown.

Weekly quizzesShort discussionsTextbook-based exams

“Weekly quizzes and as long as you read the material.”
PSYCH003

“You aren't able to ever know what you got wrong on exams in order to make sure you actually learn.”
PSYCH003

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“I would definitely recommend Ms.Nazli! Her class is so easy if you just show up and do the work. and works with you.”
Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews (6 online, 7 in person), highlighting format differences in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

👍 Recommendation Split

66/100

“Overall I would definitely take her again, she is my 4th psych class taken so far she is the best”

📚 Workload and Reading

52/100

“Be prepared to read a lot and memorize concepts. Expect to read every day.”

💻 Online Risk

35/100

“Doesn't do lectures for online class, you just read the textbook and .”

❤️ Caring Side

75/100

“Professor S really cares and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

very lecture heavy so
Her lectures are information packed
She is a good professor, very kind, but lacks organization

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

pass with a 96% which I could not believe
gives lots of and extensions
gave me a 0 in what was already a good grade

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

Doesn't do lectures for online class
The textbook is outdated
Required weekly paragraphs instead of lengthy papers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across 2020-2026 show a for a medium-confidence blended view.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57

4 out of 51

3 out of 52

2 out of 51

1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSYCH0017 reviews

PSYCH0036 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

No reported values

D range

D+ 1

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 1