AI Rate Professor

Biology

Sara Huang

PHISI01 · PHYS1492 · PHYSIOLOGY01 · PHYSI01 · CABDC · PHYSIO1 · PHYGI1713 · PHYSIOLOGY · PHYSIOLOGY1 · PHYSIOL001 · BIO7 · PHYS01 · PHYS1 · PHYSI1 · BIO6 · PHYSI001 · 121 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
27.59%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless you are ready to self-teach hard physiology and grind for .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTest heavyLecture heavySelf-teach requiredHarsh on labs
  • Most students say lectures are slide-reading and self-teaching is required.
  • , and often mismatch study guides.
  • and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A few A grades appear only after heavy daily study; many report grade and say an A is almost impossible without extreme effort.

Online and ; online comments add timed multi-question tests that .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Physiology content is dense, lecture pace is fast or shallow, and students .

Both formats describe high difficulty; while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory, tardies count as absences, and .

Online and of detailed reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and the dominant student message is to pick anyone else.

A , but the large majority across formats urge students not to enroll.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tough grader is the top tag; labs rarely get full credit and .

Format shift

Harsh grading is reported online and in person; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

and exams, picky labs, and frequent self-study outside class.

Format shift

Workload intensity is high in both formats; .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

, and leaves students to YouTube or the textbook.

Format shift

Negative teaching tone is consistent; a and study guides useful.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades hinge on long in-depth exams; labs and but cannot rescue a .

Format shift

Online comments highlight exam-driven grade swings; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews dominate and mostly warn of tough grading, dense exams, fill-in lectures, and lab nitpicking, with a minority saying .

Main concern

Harsh lab grading, exams that feel harder than lectures, and .

What students said

“Probably one of the ... She absolutely doesn't know how to teach”
PHYSIOLOGY01
“I ”
PHISI01
“ and as long as you complete the study guides you WILL BE PREPARED”
PHYS1

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online sections still feel lecture-heavy with tough timed exams and limited support; a few note or flexible exam timing, but most call the and high-stress.

Main concern

, and grades that .

What students said

“I am basically teaching myself because the lectures are long and boring and if you don't understand and ask for help, she belittles you”
PHYSI001
“Her exams are 78 questions in 85 mins, which doesn't give you enough time”
PHYS01
“I had a 93% in the class... I took the exam and my grade went down to a 71%”
BIO6

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are long, detailed, often unlike study guides, and .

Test heavyIn-depth examsStudy guides mismatchTimed examsWritten fill-ins

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as extremely in-depth with hard multiple choice plus memorized written parts.

In-depth examsWritten portion from study guideHard multiple choice
“ ”
PHYS01
“ so in depth”
PHISI01

Online

Online students report very , and questions that .

Timed multi-question examsNo dropped testsExam-heavy grading
“Her exams are 78 questions in 85 mins”
PHYS01
“The and the questions given were so different and abstract from the actual study guide”
BIO6

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I . I AM WATCHING OUT FOR Y'ALL.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, , and . Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She absolutely doesn't know how to teach, she just gives you a video to watch her read what's on the slides”

⚠️ Recommendation

28/100

“Trust me and save yourself some time and ”

📝

28/100

“NOTHING OF IT IS EVEN ON THE ”

⚖️

22/100

“ ?”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Just reads the
  • I am basically teaching myself
  • Her archaic teaching is mediocre

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The
  • I had an A in the class, I got a and dropped two letter grades
  • it is almost impossible for an A grade

Theme 3

🧪

  • When asked for lab manual
  • if you don't understand and ask for help, she belittles you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

121

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews spanning many years show consistent tough-grader and and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 517
3 out of 512
2 out of 530
1 out of 546

Course coverage

PHYS0113 reviews
PHISI016 reviews
BIO65 reviews
PHYSI0014 reviews
PHYSI014 reviews
Show 11 more courses
PHYS13 reviews
PHYSIOLOGY13 reviews
BIO72 reviews
PHYS14922 reviews
PHYSIOLOGY012 reviews
CABDC1 review
PHYGI17131 review
PHYSI11 review
PHYSIO11 review
PHYSIOL0011 review
PHYSIOLOGY1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 7 · A- 1

B range

11

B+ 1 · B 9 · B- 1

C range

6

C+ 1 · C 3 · C- 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1