AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Ali Naddafpour

ACCTG1 · ACC001 · ACCTG115737 · ACC1 · BUS001 · ACCTG01 · ACCT001 · ACCT002 · ACCTG001 · FIN008 · ACCT01 · FIN008FL2020 · ACCG01 · FINANCE008 · V3002 · ACC002 · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
93.33%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

work the homework and stay in contact, and accounting becomes manageable.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringAccessible outside classLots of homeworkAmazing lecturesClear feedback
  • Students call him one of the .
  • , and uses real-life examples.
  • , but grades feel fair if you work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many report A or B with and reading; not free, but , and practice make strong grades realistic.

In-person comments sound slightly easier due to live problem walkthroughs; online still workable for motivated students.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Accounting content is solid work with many objectives, but and resources keep it manageable rather than brutal.

Online and yet teachable; online 8-week formats feel faster.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

, while others mark attendance optional, especially online.

; many online reviews say no.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

93/100

and comments repeatedly say take him if you can.

Recommendation is strong in both formats, with rare online finance outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

some cases, and fair exams when you practice.

Format shift

Leniency shows in both formats; a .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Lots of Cengage homework and .

Format shift

and in person.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students praise patience, , and lectures that make accounting click.

Format shift

In-person praise is near universal; online is still strong with a .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Heavy Cengage homework plus multiple chapter exams or .

Format shift

and frequent tests; online leans on Canvas and Cengage.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly glowing: , and strong mentorship.

Main concern

Lots of homework and .

What students said

“He takes the as many times as needed”
ACC001
“ . Very inspirational”
ACCTG001
“He is easy to get an A. He solves more than 10 exercises and problems at the end of each chapter”
ACC1

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students , and support, though a few say pure online is harder for absolute beginners or cite older unresponsive finance sections.

Main concern

Self-motivation is needed online; occasional complaints about weak lecture posts or .

What students said

“Mr N has truly been one of the , and always supportive”
ACCTG001
“ ... provides detailed responses & summaries of each chapter”
ACC001
“I don't suggest taking him as an online course at all. Doesn't really guide students and post lectures”
ACCTG001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent but generally fair if and review his materials.

Chapter examsCanvas testsStudy guidesCengage practiceMakeups available

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

guides, and problem walkthroughs that prepare you.

Multiple chapter examsStudy guidesHomework reviewed in class
“There was 6 exams (not so difficult if you understand material) study guides given”
ACCTG01
“lots of homework and weekly exams but very straightforward”
ACCT002

Online

Online students , and the need to self-review study guides.

Canvas examsCengage homeworkStudy guides
“Do the hw review study guides for exams”
ACCTG001
“the ”
ACCTG001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you can, you wont be disappointed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting care, accessibility, and . Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Prof. N is hands down the life”

👍 Recommendation

93/100

“ if you can... Great class”

💬 Accessibility

92/100

“contact him if had a and with detailed answers”

📚 Workload Reality

42/100

“Too many hw, but you learn....”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He takes the as many times as needed
  • Brings accounting to life by using lots of real life examples
  • He simplifies all the concepts with real life examples

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • kind, patient, and always supportive
  • He treats his students like his children
  • You cannot not love this man

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • wasnt an easy A but was doable
  • lots of homework and weekly exams but very straightforward
  • He is easy to get an A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with highly consistent praise, strong grade detail, and multi-year coverage make the positive picture reliable.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 546
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ACCTG00122 reviews
ACCTG15 reviews
ACC0014 reviews
ACC12 reviews
ACCT0022 reviews
Show 11 more courses
ACCT012 reviews
ACCTG012 reviews
BUS0012 reviews
FIN0082 reviews
ACC0021 review
ACCG011 review
ACCT0011 review
ACCTG1157371 review
FIN008FL20201 review
FINANCE0081 review
V30021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 2 · A 16 · A- 1

B range

17

B+ 1 · B 16

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3