AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Pei Wang

POLI101 · POLSC3324 · POLISCI1 · POLYSCI · POLS101 · POLS3324 · POLSCI1 · POLISCI001 · POLSC1 · POSCI1 · POLSC3336 · POLIS1 · POLS001 · POL101 · POLI1 · POLYS001 · POLSC1033 · PSCI3325 · POLI3336 · POLISCII · POLS1 · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
5.26%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid for GE political science unless you already write at a high level and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderSo many papersUnclear expectationsHarsh feedbackHeavy reading
  • and hyper-specific on wording.
  • , and .
  • Many report rudeness, confusion, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Students say full credit is rare, As are very hard, and she deducts for wording that does not match her exact ideal answer.

Both online and in-person stress near-impossible full marks; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and memorization make a standard GE course feel advanced.

Difficulty is high in both formats; online adds volume of and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some sections list optional attendance while others require it or and tech issues.

; online attendance claims vary but deadlines are strict.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

and the dominant advice is enroll only as a last resort.

and in person, with only sparse older positive outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

; , and hyper-specific essay standards.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

, and a pricey textbook students often call useless.

Format shift

Online is paper-heavy; and presentations in older reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Knowledge is acknowledged, but communication, organization, spelling errors, and tone draw heavy criticism.

Format shift

; in-person also cites lateness and unprofessional moments.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of frequent papers, discussions, quizzes, and exams with timed essay components.

Format shift

Online leans paper-heavy; and pop quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and unclear expectations, with a smaller older minority saying you learn a lot if you keep up.

Main concern

, and essays that must match her exact preferred answers.

What students said

“Never once received full credit on any assignment. ”
POLYS001
“From 34 students enrolled in her class, we ended with only 8”
POL101
“This professor is truly unprofessional. She would show up 15-30 minutes late to class multiple times”
POLI1

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

weekly essays, harsh paper grading, vague or error-filled materials, and .

Main concern

and tests that feel mismatched or full of errors.

What students said

“ . There are tons of discussions, essays, and one 5 page paper”
POLISCI001
“ . She grades them so incredibly harsh”
POLS001
“ ”
POLI101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

from lectures, and include timed essay pressure.

Timed essaysMultiple choice testsVague or misspelled questionsStudy guide mismatchWeekly quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; study guides may not match what appears.

Essay exam portionsStudy guide mismatchPop quizzes
“The the study guide”
POLI1
“her study guides ”
POLISCI1

Online

Online students report multiple exams plus finals and understand.

2 exams plus finalWeekly quizzesVague test questions
“There are 2 exams + finals and those will beat you. The ”
POLISCI001
“ and incredibly vague”
POLS1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor and ”

Voice snapshots generated from 45 reviews, highlighting harsh grading, heavy writing, and low recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“GOD AWFUL. CONFUSING. TERRIBLE”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ ”

✍️

15/100

“She grades them so incredibly harsh, she was never happy with anything I wrote”

📚 Workload Load

25/100

“Expect a lot of work and ”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • Never once received
  • she will purposely avoid giving me a 100%

Theme 2

📄

  • tons of discussions, essays, and one 5 page paper
  • So many papers

Theme 3

🗣️ About Communication

  • Anytime I reached out for help, she was very rude and short with me
  • She can't spell, she's rude
  • Hard to understand.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

45

Recent reviews read by the AI

44

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

45 reviews over many years show highly consistent harsh-grading and .

Inside 45 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 57
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 525

Course coverage

POLISCI0018 reviews
POLISCI14 reviews
POL1013 reviews
POLI13 reviews
POLI1013 reviews
Show 16 more courses
POLS0013 reviews
POLSC13 reviews
POLSCI13 reviews
POLS12 reviews
POLYS0012 reviews
POLI33361 review
POLIS11 review
POLISCII1 review
POLS1011 review
POLS33241 review
POLSC10331 review
POLSC33241 review
POLSC33361 review
POLYSCI1 review
POSCI11 review
PSCI33251 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

7

B+ 1 · B 4 · B- 2

C range

6

C+ 2 · C 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 1