AI Rate Professor

Biology

Enrique Aniceto

BIO03 · BIO0153 · BIO1615 · BIO006 · BIO003 · BIO3 · ANA01 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if ; do not rely on lectures for learning.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLecture slides from bookSelf-study requiredExtra credit availableInconsistent qualityAvoid for many
  • Many students say and do not prepare for labs or tests.
  • Some report and if you read and do review questions.
  • Overall quality is low and polarized, with serious professionalism concerns in older reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

and review questions can yield A or B for diligent self-study, but lectures do not help and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard intro bio level but many find lectures unhelpful and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and one notes he will not let students leave early.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Would-take-again is mixed at about 60% among those who answered, but the bulk of detailed comments strongly advise avoiding him.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

62/100

Several students call him an easy grader with and review questions that secure at least a B.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Lecture-heavy with pop quizzes and self-reading expected; not usually described as .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Frequent complaints of , and labs students must teach each other.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Graded by few things, pop quizzes, and exams; some and group work appear as well.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

: some praise and approachability, but many call lectures useless, tests misaligned with notes, and labs poorly supported.

Main concern

Lectures often fail to prepare students for labs and .

What students said

“He didn't seem to care at all about the class. Rarely did the lecture prepare you for the lab activity.”
BIO003
“This is by far the . He and his tests are not even based on what we took notes on.”
BIO1615
“He's an .”
BIO003

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes matter, with review questions and helping, but .

Pop quizzesReview questions for testsExtra credit on tests

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes; review questions and are often mentioned.

Pop quizzesReview questionsExtra credit on tests
“He would give us review questions to do as a way to study for the tests. If you do these, you will at least get a B.”
BIO003
“For !!! Read on ur own though!!”
ANA01

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Going to class is pointless. All he does is show you slides that he copied from the book.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 , and professionalism themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚

30/100

“i got an "A" in his class by NOT listening to his useless lectures but and reviewing on my own!”

🎁 Lifeline

62/100

“Clear instructions for , and gives plenty of .”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

32/100

“Avoid!!!! !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures .
  • Often the students had to teach each other how to do parts of the lab
  • Hard to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He's an .
  • Tests are, overall, 75-80% easy.
  • gives plenty of

Theme 3

⚠️ About Professionalism

  • He deactivated the
  • !!!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen in-person reviews span 2007-2024 with mixed detail; older and newer comments both lean negative on teaching quality.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

BIO0036 reviews
BIO32 reviews
ANA011 review
BIO0061 review
BIO01531 review
Show 2 more courses
BIO031 review
BIO16151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1