AI Rate Professor

English

Millie Moncada

ENGLISH101 · ENGL102 · ENG102 · ENG24263 · ENG101 · ENG20645 · ENGLISH21 · ENGLISH38 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
17.65%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Avoid if you care about learning or support; only consider if you need a passive easy grade and can self-manage.

Best fit · Easy A HunterDisorganizedUnresponsiveTough grader tagsBroken English complaintsEasy A for some
  • Vast majority of , and unfit to teach English.
  • Online sections are especially chaotic with Canvas issues and .
  • A few students report Easy A and caring personality if you do the essays.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Several students report Easy A and if work is submitted, despite tough-grader tags from others.

Both formats mention easy grades for completers; online students still struggle more with process chaos.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Content is not intellectually hard; frustration comes from disorganization and .

Online and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and say missing classes risks failing.

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Would-take-again is about 18% and most detailed comments urge students not to enroll.

Online ; a few older in-person reviews are positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, but multiple students say essays are graded easily if completed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Many papers and reading appear, but several say the work itself is not hard.

Format shift

Online reviews stress many papers and reading; in-person similar.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Dominant , and weak subject clarity.

Format shift

Online delivery is especially criticized; in-person also mostly poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Courses center on essays, papers, group projects, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

, and subject knowledge, though a few call her sweet, caring, and an Easy A.

Main concern

, and little useful feedback on papers.

What students said

“She is a EASY A. Her lectures are not that long so many times she will let you out early.”
ENG101
“Speaks, and WRITES in broken English. No syllabus.”
ENG102
“Never gave me and never said why.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

no responses to , and strong avoid warnings.

Main concern

Zero communication and broken online course setup make the class unworkable for many.

What students said

“She is very disorganized, does not know how to use Canvas, does not take suggestions well, ineffective communicator”
ENGL102
“throughout the semester I sent her 3 msg vía different means & got 0 replies”
ENG101
“Her online course is all over the place! never answers her e-mails if .”
ENGLISH21

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly papers and quizzes; one review says she may waive the final.

Essay-heavyPop quizzesPossible optional final

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and sometimes group projects; .

Pop quizzesEssaysPossible waived final
“at the end of the semester let's you know wether ”
ENGLISH38
“ if they seem daunting as she grades so easily.”
ENG101

Online

Online reviews focus on paper submission chaos and .

Papers on CanvasUnclear submission format
“Papers are so difficult to submit as she doesnt know how to set up a format for submission.”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ABSOLUTELY AWFUL. No one in the class understood the syllabus and had to ask each other for help because .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews across online and . Credibility rating: High.

💢 Teaching Disaster

18/100

“Professor Moncada is ABSOLUTLEY HORRIBLE! !”

✉️ Zero Communication

15/100

“Very hard to contact, throughout the semester I sent her 3 msg vía different means & got 0 replies.”

🎯 Easy A Outlier

78/100

“She is a EASY A. Her lectures are not that long so many times she will let you out early.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • does not
  • goes on irrelevant, exhausting tangents
  • Unorganized,

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is a EASY A
  • She's not very difficult at all, but you will learn NOTHING
  • if they seem daunting as she grades so easily

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Professor Moncada is a very sweet lady
  • Is condescending and rude
  • has a habit of being condescending and petty

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews with consistent negative patterns across years and both formats strengthen credibility despite a few glowing outliers.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ENG1018 reviews
ENGLISH1013 reviews
ENG1021 review
ENG206451 review
ENG242631 review
Show 3 more courses
ENGL1021 review
ENGLISH211 review
ENGLISH381 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2