AI Rate Professor

English

Reginald Hubbard

ESL5A · ESL8 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative; students , and a poor overall experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy PapersInconsistent ExpectationsLecture HeavyAvoid If Possible
  • Multiple students call him awful and
  • , and
  • Expectations can feel contradictory and hard to satisfy

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

and comments that only geniuses or favorites get a B show an A is very costly.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

, and many papers make the content and workload intellectually and logistically hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and a skip-class-and-you-will-not-pass warning.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

and repeated awful or stay-far-away language dominate the reviews.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Tagged as a and comments that a B is very hard to get.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Repeated tags for lots of homework, so many papers, and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students call him awful, note contradictions in standards, and say almost nobody likes him as a professor.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Papers, reading, and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

heavy papers and , and teaching methods that many students reject.

Main concern

Tough grading plus inconsistent expectations make strong grades hard to earn.

What students said

“Try to stay very far from him .This person has some serious contradictions in himself .”
ESL8
“he is awful”
ESL5A
“Professor Hubbard is not bad, but his method of teaching is not for everyone.”
ESL5A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove webcam or Lockdown Browser use; overall assessment feel and heavy papers.

Tough GradingPaper Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; they emphasize tough grading and many papers rather than exam software.

Tough GradingPaper HeavyGraded by Few Things
“You have to be a genius or he should like you very much to get "B".”
ESL8
“Lots of ”
ESL5A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Try to stay very far from him .This person has some serious contradictions in himself .Something he claims to be right today tomorrow is no longer right .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting , and heavy papers. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Warning

12/100

“Try to stay very far from him”

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“he is awful”

📝 Workload Pressure

18/100

“So many papers”

⚖️

15/100

“You have to be a genius or he should like you very much to get "B".”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he is awful
  • his method of teaching is not for everyone
  • serious contradictions in himself

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to be a genius or he should like you very much to get "B"
  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • So many papers
  • Get ready to read
  • Lecture heavy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Three in-person reviews across 2019-2024 are consistently negative on recommendation and workload, with enough detail for a medium-confidence read.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ESL5A2 reviews
ESL81 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values