AI Rate Professor

Economics

Shawn Moshiri

ECON1 · ECON202 · ECONOMICS1 · ECON3122 · ECON001 · ECON101 · MATH265 · ECON2 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

; if you can learn economics almost entirely from the textbook.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLecture-test mismatchTextbook dependentHeavy homeworkEgo-driven teachingBoring long lectures
  • Tests and site, not his lectures.
  • unhelpful.
  • A few students find him funny and passable if .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

A few older comments say easy A if you read, but and low take-again rates.

All evidence is in person; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students call economics tough and say his delivery and .

All evidence is in person; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Many say he takes roll and despite weak lectures.

All evidence is in person; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Only and waste-of-time warnings.

All evidence is in person; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and complaints about opaque finals or .

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews available.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

, and high-stakes if .

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews available.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Often described as knowledgeable or funny but ineffective, disrespectful, or disconnected from assessed material.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews available.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

; homework helps some but .

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All reviews are in person and largely negative: , and low teaching value.

Main concern

, so success depends on independent textbook study.

What students said

“What he shows in the class is NOT on the tests. The only reason you have to even go to class is because .”
ECON202
“ and READ THE TEXTBOOK.”
ECON001
“Definitely in the . Very disrespectful... Run.”
MATH265

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequently misaligned with lectures and hard, with .

Tests not matching lecturesPublisher or book-based examsIn-class online testsDrops lowest test sometimesHeavy homework sets

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

manufacturer site rather than lecture content, and can feel unfairly hard.

Book-based testsLecture-test mismatchIn-class online testsDrops lowest score sometimes
“The and are 100% based on the book you don't use in class.”
ECON202
“Professor does not make the so what he teaches is completely different from what is on the tests and hw”
ECON001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“What he shows in the class is NOT on the tests. The only reason you have to even go to class is because .”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 in-person reviews, highlighting exam mismatch, workload, and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Disconnect

34/100

“Lectures are horrible and useless. !”

📚 Textbook Is The Class

40/100

“Just read the book and you'll do fine on the !”

🚫 Low Recommendation

30/100

“ !!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he is clearly just teaching for an extra paycheck
  • He's also pretty funny
  • Very disrespectful, ridicules students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • hardest class and
  • Easy A if you pay attention

Theme 3

📋

  • so make sure you do
  • assigns so and all of them are 60 questions
  • of the book if you miss 1 assignment you lose full credit for HW

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

29 in-person reviews over many years consistently criticize lecture-test mismatch, supporting solid medium credibility despite sparse grade data.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ECON111 reviews
ECON25 reviews
ECON0014 reviews
ECON1013 reviews
ECON31223 reviews
Show 3 more courses
ECON2021 review
ECONOMICS11 review
MATH2651 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Rather not say 2