AI Rate Professor

Microbiology

Kelvin Harris Jr

MICRO020 · MICRO20 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless you have no alternative and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganizedTest heavyTough graderBehind schedulePolarizing lectures
  • Two of three reviews strongly .
  • Common complaints are disorganization, falling behind the syllabus, and .
  • One and , so experiences may vary by term.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Tough-grader and test-heavy tags plus stressed students who studied hard still report a rough path to good grades.

All evidence is In person; no Online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty sits high and students describe dense quiz or test pressure while the class falls behind.

All evidence is In person MICRO20.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and one tag warns that skipping means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

; two detailed reviews explicitly tell others not to enroll.

Recommendation split is entirely from In person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

and test-heavy labels dominate despite one comment about clearer criteria.

Format shift

Based only on In person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of homework and test-heavy tags outweigh one student .

Format shift

Based only on In person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Most students call the class disorganized and off-syllabus, even though one praises lectures and .

Format shift

Based only on In person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, and test-heavy tags show exams drive the .

Format shift

Based only on In person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person MICRO20 feedback is mostly negative on organization and reliability, with one positive note on lecture style and .

Main concern

Falling behind the syllabus and .

What students said

“ , and unreliable.”
MICRO020
“ ! This is from someone who studied their butt off for lecture and . He is TERRIBLE!”
MICRO20
“I liked that he didn't sign too much homework which gave me time to study material a different way if I didn't understand.”
MICRO20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course assessment is test-centered with pop quizzes and .

Test heavyPop quizzesLab and lecture quizzesTough grading

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students describe lecture and , and high-stakes exam pressure with little evidence of open-book formats.

Test heavyPop quizzesLab quiz/testTough grader
“This is from someone who studied their butt off for lecture and . He is TERRIBLE!”
MICRO20
“Beware of pop quizzes”
MICRO20

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! This is from someone who studied their butt off for lecture and . He is TERRIBLE!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ , and unreliable.”

📉 Recommendation Risk

30/100

“ !”

🧪

28/100

“studied their butt off for lecture and . He is TERRIBLE!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and unreliable.
  • Wont finish the topic till a few class periods
  • Amazing lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Test heavy
  • Beware of pop quizzes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews exist and they conflict, so confidence is limited even though the negative pattern is strong.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MICRO202 reviews
MICRO0201 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1