AI Rate Professor

Biology

Rosario Briones

ENVSCI01 · BIO003 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you are fully self-directed and and policy demands without exceptions.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRigid rulesAuthoritativeUnaccommodatingLecture heavySelf-study required
  • , and course rules with little flexibility
  • Multiple students describe harsh treatment, poor help, and
  • One online student warmed up due to materials, but overall tone is strongly negative

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and rigid policies raise the cost of any slip.

Online review is milder; and outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

, and little clarifying support from the instructor.

; and self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

Attendance and participation are strictly enforced, with little room for accommodations.

Both formats emphasize mandatory attendance; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most reviews urge students to take the class elsewhere due to rigidity and poor support.

; in-person reviews strongly advise against.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report inflexible rules, grade frustration, and little willingness to accommodate hardship.

Format shift

review.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, and tests rather than endless busywork.

Format shift

Limited detail across formats; online notes study materials and videos.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Reviews describe authoritative style, book recitation, ignored questions, and low care for students.

Format shift

Online is slightly better on materials; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Finals, assignments, and strict policy enforcement appear more central than coaching or projects.

Format shift

Sparse detail overall; in-person BIO003 emphasizes final-test impact on the grade.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe rigid authority, book-heavy lectures, poor help, and harsh outcomes including a .

Main concern

Lack of empathy and help can derail grades even when students try to stay engaged.

What students said

“She is absolutely the worst.”
ENVSCI01
“When we asked her questions she told us to google it.”
BIO003
“She requires you to read word for word from the book and then has a lecture word for work from the book”
ENVSCI01

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ENVSCI01 was strict on attendance and participation but offered study materials and informative videos.

Main concern

Uncompromising rules may still alienate students needing flexibility.

What students said

“She's uncompromising , and accommodations, but she provides a lot of study materials and fun, very informative videos.”
ENVSCI01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; grading and finals feel high-stakes and inflexible.

Final exam impactTextbook-based lecturesStrict course rules

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments stress strict rules and .

Final exam impactTextbook lectures
“I got a 95% on the final yet she still would only give me a B.”
BIO003

Online

Online reviews .

Study materials provided
“she provides a lot of study materials and fun, very informative videos.”
ENVSCI01

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is absolutely the worst.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (1 online, 3 in person), highlighting rigidity and support issues. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Such a horrible professor. She has a very authoritative personality and .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ .”

⚖️

18/100

“I got a 95% on the final yet she still would only give me a B.”

📍

8/100

“She's uncompromising , and accommodations”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • When we asked her questions she told us to google it.
  • She requires you to read word for word from the book
  • unless you like to learn on your own.

Theme 2

📈 About Policies and Grades

  • she said that I was aware of the rules before starting her class, then promptly dropped me from her class.
  • I got a 95% on the final yet she still would only give me a B.

Theme 3

💻 Online Experience

  • I eventually warmed up to her, but she certainly won't be for everyone.
  • she provides a lot of study materials and fun, very informative videos.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 reviews with sparse detail and mixed formats limit confidence despite consistent negativity.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENVSCI013 reviews
BIO0031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1