Jaclyn Magginetti

ANT101 · ANTH101 · ANTHRO102 · ANTHRO101 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 58/100
RMP rating: 3.0/5
Take again: 57.14%
Difficulty: 2.7

The decision

Prefer her in person if possible; online works if you can handle typos and double-check her materials.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed online qualityOpen-book quizzesCanvas typosExtra creditPassionate lectures

In-person students praise passion, help, and fair work
Online and broken-modules complaints
Grades are often A-range even when organization frustrates students

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

Many students earn A or A-minus if they complete work and read, but summer and some online sections are not free As.

Online often yields As despite messiness; A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

, though 8-week and summer pacing can feel fast.

Online 8-week courses feel faster; in person is doable if you keep up with lectures and reading.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and optional or unstated in others, so flexibility depends on the section.

Online and in .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Strong fans exist alongside serious organization and conduct complaints, so recommendation depends on format and tolerance for mess.

In-person reviews are warmer; online is polarized between love and avoid.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grading is often fair with , though one student said she can be mood-dependent and another fixed answer-key errors.

Format shift

and mood variance; in person simply says do the work and pass.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Expect , and a multi-page project in faster online terms.

Format shift

Online 8-week formats add a ; in if you keep up.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Passion, empathy, and help are real, but typos, broken links, and a severe conduct complaint pull the experience down.

Format shift

In person teaching is stronger; online is dragged by course-site quality issues.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of reading quizzes, participation, and a .

Format shift

Online stresses open-book quizzes and a 5-page project; in person stresses lectures and assigned work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and manageable if you attend lectures and read.

Main concern

Not an automatic easy A in accelerated summer formats.

What students said

“She is a really good teacher her work is not hard just do what she assigns and you'll pass”
ANTHRO101

“One of the ! Her passion for teaching made me want to come to class”
ANT101

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online anthro ranges from caring open-book courses with and broken links.

Main concern

Typos, broken links, and answer-key errors force students to police the course site.

What students said

“By far one of . !”
ANTH101

“Her modules are filled with SO many typos which gets incredibly annoying”
ANTHRO101

“She has a ton of typos in instructions and .”
ANTHRO102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

is relatively student-friendly.

Open-book quizzesReading-based testsExtra credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews stress attending lectures and .

Lecture-based learningReading required

“Lectures are a must! Read the book! don't just memorize the material but understand it.”
ANT101

Online

Online students report open-book quizzes from the book plus reading-based tests and a longer project.

Open-book quizzesReading-based tests5-page project

“ if you read the .”
ANTH101

“ and there is a 5 page project”
ANTHRO102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“By far one of . !”
Voice snapshots generated from 7 mixed online and in-person reviews. Credibility rating: Medium.

💖 Passion & Care

70/100

“She's extremely empathic, makes sure to respond to messages promptly, grades fairly”

🧩 Course Organization

30/100

“Her modules are filled with SO many typos which gets incredibly annoying”

📘 Open-Book Tests

78/100

“ if you read the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

One of the !
She is a really good teacher her work is not hard
She's extremely empathic

Theme 2

🖥️ About Online Setup

She has a ton of typos in instructions and .
I had to contact her multiple times about because her had incorrect answers.
Always felt I needed to double-check her work... BEWARE

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

THIS IS NOT AN EASY A.
if you do good on everything and do OK on the .
Gives .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews from 2019-2024 give enough detail for mixed conclusions, but strong polarization and one serious allegation lower confidence.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52

4 out of 51

3 out of 51

2 out of 51

1 out of 52

Course coverage

ANTHRO1013 reviews

ANTHRO1022 reviews

ANT1011 review

ANTH1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

A 4 · A- 1

B range

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values