AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Veronica Getskow

CHILDDEV · CHDEV010 · CHDEV02 · CD011 · CD42 · CD10 · CD2 · CD11 · CD3080 · CD35 · CD1 · CD3081 · CHILD1 · 45 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
83.87%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you will attend and work; you will learn a lot and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringInspirationalParticipation MattersClear FeedbackCareer Mentor
  • passionate, knowledgeable, and a reason many stay in Child Development.
  • Show up, engage, do the work, and you can earn an A; some call her tough with high standards, not a free A.
  • Attendance and participation matter; and notes, with projects and some .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Do the work, participate, and use notes or and most report A-range grades; laziness is punished.

Both formats support do-the-work-for-A; and quizzes.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Content is manageable when you attend and ; difficulty averages mid but .

if you engage; online difficulty notes are sparse.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Many tags and comments say and skipping hurts you badly.

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

About 84% would take again; students stack multiple CD courses with her and call her the .

Strong recommendation is mostly in person; online is 2 positive and 1 strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

, and reward for effort dominate; a minority call her a .

Format shift

; online positives still report solid grades.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Projects, presentations, quizzes, and readings exist, but many say work is doable and .

Format shift

Lots of ; online comments focus more on lectures and feedback.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Passionate, knowledgeable lectures with and mentorship; a few find her personality or pace off.

Format shift

Excellence is clearest in person; online is mostly positive with one personality complaint.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and assignments rather than one pure style.

Format shift

; online says little about exam tech.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person she is widely seen as a CD department star: caring, inspiring, and fair if you engage, with .

Main concern

, and hard tests for students who do not study notes.

What students said

“She is the reason that I am now 100% sure that I want to major in Child Development.”
CHDEV02
“Show up to class, act like the adult that you are, do the simple work required, get an A.”
CD10
“She looks very easy, but she is not easy , ”
CD10

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students , and care; one negative review criticizes personality and how she handles questions.

Main concern

A minority report unhelpful responses to questions and uneven treatment online.

What students said

“Dr Veronica Getskow is so smart and she Knows her stuff and cares for her students.”
CD42
“She is not a good professor, she may have a good knowledge but her personality isn't good”
CD2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests often come from slides and notes; group projects and some .

PowerPoint-Based TestsMidterm and FinalGroup ProjectExtra Credit Options

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some say all-of-the-above is often correct.

PowerPoint QuizzesMidterm and FinalGroup ProjectExtra Credit
“Midterm and if you pay attention in class. A Midterm, final, 1 group project, and 2 other assignments.”
CD35
“If there is an "all of the above" choice on her tests, 9/10 it's the right answer.”
CD10

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown, or open-book rules; feedback and lectures are the main notes.

Gives Good FeedbackLecture Heavy
“Dr. Getskow knows so much. She makes class interesting.”
CD2
“She doesn't care if ”
CD2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Show up to class, act like the adult that you are, do the simple work required, get an A. That simple!”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews (3 online, 43 in person), highlighting care, CD mentorship, and effort-based As. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She is the reason that I am now 100% sure that I want to major in Child Development.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ !!!!!!”

❤️ Caring Mentor

90/100

“She is the sweetest human being I have ever encountered!”

⚖️ Standards & Grades

78/100

“She is an amazing professor and her classes are easy if you do the work and participate.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes class interesting
  • amazing lectures
  • she goes kinda quick so I suggest taking a photo of the slides
  • true gem

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • do the simple work required, get an A
  • she is not easy ,
  • 3 choices for

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • cares for her students
  • sweetheart and is very honest with you
  • inspiration
  • Most disappointed professor in LAVC

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

45

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

46 reviews over many years with rich detail and strong majority consensus; minority negatives are real but outnumbered.

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 533
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CD1019 reviews
CD426 reviews
CD25 reviews
CD13 reviews
CHDEV0103 reviews
Show 8 more courses
CD112 reviews
CHILDDEV2 reviews
CD0111 review
CD30801 review
CD30811 review
CD351 review
CHDEV021 review
CHILD11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 7 · A 13 · A- 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not_Sure_Yet 2 · Rather not say 2