AI Rate Professor

African-American Studies

Mitchell Alexsandra

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid if ; expect and fight for basic clarification.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCondescendingHard to ReachIllegible MaterialsTough GraderNo Real Teaching
  • Both students report condescending replies and ignored emails until admin pressure.
  • Teaching delivery is called nonexistent; scanned materials are often illegible.
  • Grades reached B+ but the experience felt hostile and unsupported.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Both students earned B+ after a an A.

All evidence is from online reviews; no in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty is rated at the top and .

All evidence is from online reviews; no in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory with no sign of flexibility.

All evidence is from online reviews; no in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Neither student endorses retaking her; communication and teaching problems dominate.

All evidence is from online reviews; no in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

; and support is poor.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews; no in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

No flood of homework is described, but be.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews; no in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students say teaching style is nonexistent, delivery is insufficient, and help is condescending.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews; no in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

and assignments are mentioned, but weight of .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews; no in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Both online reviews describe condescending communication, delayed responses, and weak teaching delivery despite decent course content.

Main concern

Unresponsive and condescending instructor .

What students said

“If you ask for any type of clarification, she will be condescending towards you and make it as though .”
21519
“The teaching style is nonexistent & her delivery is insufficient.”
21519

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention midterm guidelines early but .

Midterm Guidelines EarlyUnclear Expectations

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online comments note midterm guidelines expected in week one but do not prove camera or .

Midterm GuidelinesUnclear Expectations
“She expects you to know and understand the and expectations the first week of class.”
21519

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The teaching style is nonexistent & her delivery is insufficient.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

12/100

“The teaching style is nonexistent & her delivery is insufficient.”

📧 Communication Issues

15/100

“Half the class reached out to admin to get her to respond to .”

😤 Condescending Tone

10/100

“she will be condescending towards you and make it as though .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The teaching style is nonexistent & her delivery is insufficient
  • Most of the material is scanned in by her (which is great) however, its illegible

Theme 2

📧 About Communication

  • She is hard to reach for info
  • Then she sends condescending notes to the class pretending she was ignoring us purposely

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two recent online reviews agree strongly, but the sample is too small for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

215192 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values