AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mary M. Hito

MATH · MATH240 · V7416 · MATH112 · MATH125 · MATH259 · MATH215 · MAT115 · MAATH120 · PRCAL5556 · MATH120 · MATH2401011 · MATH110 · MATH238 · V1412 · MATH260 · 133 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
45.16%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you already like math, will self-teach, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTest heavyLots of homeworkPolarizing lecturesExam corrections vary
  • Grades and many call her a
  • Lectures are often described as fast, example-only, and without self-study
  • , and care when effort is high

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even A students describe heavy practice and ; many report Fs or .

; in-person reviews stress exam-only weighting.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

26/100

Pace is fast, proofs and multi-section days are common, and .

Both formats describe rushed lectures; online students add MyMathLab and group-project friction.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and tags like skip class you will not pass appear repeatedly.

Online as required in several recent reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Would-take-again is only about 45% with a sharp split between devoted fans and .

Recent online reviews lean more negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

; points lost for method, wording, or partial work, with limited recovery.

Format shift

; in person often only exams and .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of , and frequent practice needed even when HW barely counts.

Format shift

; in person HW may not count but still expects practice.

Teaching experience

Average

44/100

Some find her patient and ; many say she solves problems without explaining concepts.

Format shift

Online clarity and terms.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

84/100

Common structure is a uncollected or tiny weight.

Format shift

; online still ties outcomes to timed tests and sparse graded items.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some call her caring with practice exams and and grades rest almost only on tests.

Main concern

Test-heavy weighting and fast, can tank grades even for strong math students.

What students said

“You basically need to teach yourself calculus. .”
MATH
“3 exams worth 60% - final worth 40%.”
MATH238
“SHE IS AWESOME! I loved every lecture! She lets you work on .”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online and strict grading; several students report late grading, weak Zoom clarity, and .

Main concern

and delayed feedback leave students unsure they are failing until late.

What students said

“She grades the .”
MATH259
“ .”
MATH215
“She is a .”
MATH215

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams dominate the grade; practice tests help prepared students, but and .

Test heavyPractice examsLimited correctionsHarsh partial credit

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, grade is often 3 exams plus final; practice exams and , but method must match hers.

3 midterms + finalPractice exams5-point correctionsMethod-specific grading
“Grades based on 3 exams worth 20% each and one final worth 40%.”
MATH238
“ if you did it another method even if you got the answer right.”
MATH238

Online

Online , and hard exams with little cushion.

Harsh homework gradingLate grade postingExam typos reported
“She grades the .”
MATH259
“she did not grade any assignments until the last day of class”
MATH259

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Awful professor. unless you already have taken the course with another professor. No one passed her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (10 online, 40 in person), balancing praise and strong warnings. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

44/100

“ . Instead, she just plucks problems from the book and solves them on the screen.”

⚖️

24/100

“She is a .”

📝

84/100

“Your grade is based solely on the tests. Good luck”

❤️ Supportive Side

70/100

“Prof Hito truly cares. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She rushed through every lecture and expected students to remember how to do the problems
  • and online
  • Each one of be

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • if you're looking for an easy A
  • Stay away! , and tests are full of tricks
  • She lets you correct your wrong answers for credit

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Experience

  • ALWAYS forgets to open MyMathLab assignments putting students behind on HW
  • Lectures are useless
  • if you can help it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

133

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews across online and in person, many years, and and toughness support high credibility.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 518
3 out of 521
2 out of 532
1 out of 531

Course coverage

MATH1259 reviews
MATH1206 reviews
MATH2386 reviews
MATH2595 reviews
MATH2154 reviews
Show 14 more courses
MATH2604 reviews
MATH2403 reviews
MAATH1202 reviews
1121 review
1251 review
2401 review
MAT1151 review
MATH1 review
MATH1101 review
MATH1121 review
MATH24010111 review
PRCAL55561 review
V14121 review
V74161 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

4

B 4

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

5

F 5

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Fail 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5