AI Rate Professor

English

Lavergne Rosow

ENG2128 · ENG28 · ENG028 · V1212 · ENG033 · ENG021 · ENG102 · ENGLISH33 · EN103 · 28ENGL · ENGLISH21 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · V3147 · ENGLISH102 · ENGLISH28 · ENGLISH · ENGLISH028 · 162 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
25.93%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless you are an English-major type ready for , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear instructionsTough graderHeavy paper loadDisorganizedAvoid if possible
  • Most students report , and crushing writing workloads.
  • Online and .
  • A minority find her strict methods prepare them for later English and call her caring if you work hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Harsh grading, cascading assignment chains, and frequent D/F or and high-effort.

; in-person is also tough but has a few A stories with heavy work.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Constant papers, reading logs, research, blogs, and and process exhausting.

and writing; online adds daily forum commenting.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Some sections mark attendance mandatory or participation-critical, while .

Online often non-mandatory for seat time but expects daily online presence; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Roughly three-quarters of voices warn others away despite a vocal minority who thrived under her strict style.

Online recommendation tone is worse overall; in-person has more mixed but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and stories of low marks despite effort dominate, with limited revision credit.

Format shift

Harsh tone appears in both formats; online students stress failing top scores.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

So , and online blogs create constant overload.

Format shift

Online adds continuous peer commenting; in-person adds presentations and dictation challenges.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

, and poor communication, with minority praise for feedback and care.

Format shift

Online organization complaints are louder; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and projects rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats are paper-heavy; online emphasizes forums and blogs.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

many call her the , while a smaller group praises tough preparation and support.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“ .”
28ENGL
“Doc Rosow, is an AWESOME professor! If you want to learn, be prepared for English 101 and ”
ENG028
“THE WORST. as a winter class and was terrible.”
ENGLISH28

Remote format

Online

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online English sections are widely described as , and and do-not-take warnings.

Main concern

Unclear online instructions, heavy blogging or .

What students said

“ ”
ENG102
“Disorganized! Didn't follow the syllabus at all, a lot was never gotten to.”
ENG028
“Even if this is .”
28ENGL

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on stacked writing tasks and projects; .

Paper-heavy assessmentReading logsGroup projectsUnclear criteriaRevision allowed sometimes

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

presentations, and research papers with strict formatting rules.

Many essaysDaily reading logResearch paperStrict formatting
“Expect to write a lot of essays, and a tree presentation. You must keep a ”
ENGLISH28
“she won't if the header isn't perfect”
28ENGL

Online

Online work focuses on blogs, peer comments, stacked essays, and .

Constant online commentingBlog writingStacked essay chainUnclear deadlines
“Professor, Rosow makes you contribute too much online as if you are a full time blogger.”
28ENGL
“Her grading distribution is very disorganized, like assigning 50% worth essay only 4 days before end of semester.”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 mixed online and and a smaller hardcore-success minority. Credibility rating: High.

🚫

22/100

“Even if this is . Even if you have to skip a semester, do it.”

📝

20/100

“Doesn't tell you what she wants from you, and then marks you down for not doing it.”

⚖️

18/100

“fails every student while blaming you/previous teachers, and is the most unflexible teacher out there.”

💪 Minority Tough-Love Praise

70/100

“She is a professor that makes you work for your grade, no handout grades in this class!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's
  • Her teaching is incredibly out of date
  • Doc Rosow, is an AWESOME professor!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • be prepared for a gauged to fail learning style
  • because I knew there was no way I was going to get an A.
  • If you stay on top of your assingments you will pass.

Theme 3

💔 About Stress and Communication

  • The only thing you gain from her classes is stomach cramps, nervousness and depression.
  • .
  • she wouldn't reply to emails nor .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

162

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews across online and with consistent themes of confusion and harsh grading.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 510
3 out of 58
2 out of 534
1 out of 593

Course coverage

28ENGL12 reviews
ENGLISH286 reviews
ENG0285 reviews
ENG284 reviews
ENG1013 reviews
Show 14 more courses
ENG0332 reviews
ENG1022 reviews
ENG21282 reviews
ENGLISH0282 reviews
ENGLISH1022 reviews
ENGLISH212 reviews
70491 review
EN1031 review
ENG0211 review
ENGL1011 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH331 review
V12121 review
V31471 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

3

D 2 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2