AI Rate Professor

History

Annie Goldman-Reed

POL001 · LAW3 · POLSCI1 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you will read and write seriously; online needs extra self-direction and caution.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCivil rights passionEssay-heavy lawCaring lecturerParticipation mattersUnclear online prompts
  • and civil rights focus
  • A is achievable with reading, papers, and participation but not free
  • and last-minute deadlines

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Several As appear, but comments stress working for the , and participation rather than .

In person calls it an easy A with work; online notes few graded items but .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

yet requires critical reading and multi-page writing.

Online difficulty ratings swing lower/higher; in person clusters around moderate.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and note participation matters.

Mandatory attendance is clearer in in-person LAW3 comments; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Majority praise passion and learning value, tempered and occasional clarity complaints.

In-person recommendations are strong; one .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and , but students still work for As; grades range from B to A+.

Format shift

Online notes graded by few things; in person emphasizes essays and participation.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Typical load is weekly work or and .

Format shift

In person stresses reading and papers; online mentions assignment volume and a .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Often called fantastic and passionate about civil rights, with a .

Format shift

Teaching praise is strongest in person; online reviews are more mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Mix of and .

Format shift

In ; online also references exams and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students largely praise clear teaching of , and interesting reading with essay tests.

Main concern

and paper writing.

What students said

“She made hard material easy to understand. Passed with an A.”
LAW3
“Easy A if you and participate.”
LAW3
“There's a lot of reading but all very interesting and useful.”
LAW3

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some find her caring but assignment expectations and of a last-minute final deadline change.

Main concern

and deadline communication online.

What students said

“ as and finals. Very little direction so buddy up with a classmate.”
LAW3
“ . Overall a great professor but finish your work asap because she pushed the deadline for our Final forward last minute”
POL001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are mainly essay exams and papers with moderate rigor and .

Essay midterm and finalPaper-based workParticipation weightedOnline prompts sometimes unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person and ; show up, read, and participate.

Essay midtermEssay finalPapersParticipation
“She only gives 2 tests- Midterms and .”
LAW3
“Be prepared to write! You have to work for an A.”
POLSCI1

Online

Online exams and and limited direction; one final deadline was moved last minute.

Confusing exam promptsFinal deadline changeFew graded items
“ as and finals.”
LAW3
“she pushed the deadline for our Final forward last minute (I found out 4 hours before it was due)”
POL001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The best Professor I have had this year well maybe one in my entire college life. She is passionate about her work and very resourceful outside of class as well. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews (2 online, 8 in person), highlighting teaching passion, writing load, and online clarity issues. Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Quality

80/100

“She made hard material easy to understand. Passed with an A.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“LOVE LOVE LOVE Professor Goldman-Reed! Take this class!”

📝 Work For The A

64/100

“Be prepared to write! You have to work for an A.”

⚠️ Online Clarity Gap

40/100

“ as and finals.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She genuinely cares about Civil Rights and it's awesome.
  • Her approach is very unassuming but before you know it, you are discussing the law and the constitution with authority
  • Makes you think critically.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you and participate.
  • and 2 papers all together.
  • There's a lot of reading but all very interesting and useful.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • Very little direction so buddy up with a classmate.
  • .
  • finish your work asap because she pushed the deadline for

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across years with both online and , and mostly consistent praise aside from one sharp online critique.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

LAW38 reviews
POL0011 review
POLSCI11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1