AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Preethamol Puthiakunnel

NRN101 · NUR1 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative; most students report an unsupportive, high-fail environment.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnsupportiveTough graderDemandingFails studentsDepartment toxicity
  • Two of three reviews call her inappropriate, unsupportive, and intent on failing students.
  • Nursing pathway is hard; .
  • and harsh tone dominate the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Tags and and intentional failing; no easy A path is described.

Both online and pass.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Difficulty ratings sit at 4-5 and students call nursing a demanding, fail-heavy pathway.

Online and in-person both rate difficulty at 5 or 4.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

; no optional-attendance evidence.

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Only one of ; majority warn others to apply elsewhere.

; the only online review says no.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

fail people.

Format shift

Harsh tone appears in both online and in-person negatives.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students describe a very demanding nursing pathway with high pressure.

Format shift

Workload intensity is similar across formats in the few reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Average quality 2.3 with two scathing reviews outweighing one positive.

Format shift

; online is entirely negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments focus on overall fail risk and support, not a .

Format shift

Neither format details assessment weights clearly.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

if you follow instructions; the other calls her wildly inappropriate and unsupportive.

Main concern

Perceived intent to fail students and lack of support.

What students said

“She is wildly inappropriate and inconsiderate. I agree that .”
NUR1
“The nursing program at LAVC its a wonderful, the but as long as you follow the instructions you will do great.”
NRN101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One online review is extremely negative, calling staff bitter and saying the department intentionally fails students.

Main concern

Hostile department culture and intentional fail-out perception.

What students said

“This lady, along with the rest of the LAVC nursing staff (sans maybe 4 instructors there), shouldnt be allowed to teach”
NRN101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is wildly inappropriate and inconsiderate. I agree that .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (1 online, 2 in person), highlighting support and fail-out themes. Credibility rating: Low.

💀 Teaching Disaster

22/100

“This lady, along with the rest of the LAVC nursing staff (sans maybe 4 instructors there), shouldnt be allowed to teach”

🚫 Recommendation Warning

20/100

“Do yourself a favor and apply elsewhere.”

🔥 Harsh Fail Pressure

15/100

“Very demanding and very unsupportive.”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Support & Fairness

  • She is wildly inappropriate and inconsiderate.
  • I agree that .
  • Very demanding and very unsupportive.

Theme 2

❤️ Lone Positive Note

  • the
  • as long as you follow the instructions you will do great.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews from 2020-2022 with polar opinions and limited grade data.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

NRN1012 reviews
NUR11 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1