AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Bahram Badiyi

ENGINEERING101 · EGT100 · EGT104 · GENENG101 · ENG100 · ENG103 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
82.35%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Strongly recommended for engineering career insight and fair As if ; .

Best fit · Effort For RewardInspirational MentorCareer LaunchpadAmazing LecturesEasy A OnlineCanvas Mess Risk
  • Most students call him the .
  • Grades trend heavily A or A+ with manageable work when deadlines are met.
  • A minority slam late harsh grading and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Many report A+ , and simple online modules when work is submitted on time.

Online leans easiest; in person still grades generously with more lecture and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Intro engineering content is approachable; but average difficulty stays low.

Online modules are lighter; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and skip-class warnings while others mark attendance not mandatory.

Online is generally flexible; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

and call him best professor for engineering careers despite a few organization complaints.

In-person enthusiasm is highest; online reviews split between easy A and mess.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Heavy A and A+ outcomes and ; a few call him a tough or .

Format shift

Online can feel very lenient; .

Workload

Light

72/100

; occasional large problem sets and deadline discipline for online modules.

Format shift

Online is module-light; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Repeated five-star praise for knowledge, lectures, care, and career mentorship outweigh Canvas and organization critiques.

Format shift

In-person teaching shines; online delivery quality is more uneven.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Mix of homework, short quizzes, modules, and .

Format shift

Online leans quizzes and ; in person blends lectures and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

as inspirational, caring, and career-relevant with mostly easy-to-fair difficulty.

Main concern

and English clarity notes.

What students said

“He is an inspiration, he helped me narrow down my engineering choice to Civil Engineering”
ENGINEERING101
“THE ! Take his class and you will have a friend for life.”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online GENENG101 can be an easy A with simple modules, but and the .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“I ended the class with over a 99% (no offered).”
GENENG101
“The class was a complete mess. The to do with the class.”
GENENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Multiple reports of and short quizzes; strict proctoring is not clearly proven.

Take-Home FinalOnline Web Research ExamsShort Timed QuizzesSimple Module Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; other sections use notes-heavy lecture exams without lockdown details.

Take-Home FinalLecture-Based TestsHomework-Heavy Weeks
“Great Professor. . everyone got A.”
GENENG101
“just do the homework and ;)”
ENG103

Online

Homework and and lectures; one review calls the final unrelated to class content.

Online Exam SubmissionWeb Research AllowedModule Quizzes
“Homework and on the web, and the lecture. Easy A class.”
GENENG101
“the . This class (the .) is an insult to intelligence.”
GENENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I am forever grateful that I did. He is an inspiration, he helped me narrow down my engineering choice to Civil Engineering and because of him I left with a vast knowledge in engineering that ultimately led me to land a paid internship.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews (4 online, 20 in person), balancing career-mentor praise with organization critiques. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Career Mentorship

90/100

“He is an inspiration, he helped me narrow down my engineering choice to Civil Engineering”

📈 Easy Grade Path

84/100

“I ended the class with over a 99% (no offered).”

⚠️ Organization Risk

30/100

“He is a , and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is honestly the ! and full of knowledge and experience.
  • His lectures are so useful and he is amazing professor
  • engaging if engineering is your interest

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A class.
  • . everyone got A.
  • If you are diligent with your if you mess up.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • The class was a complete mess.
  • , and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four reviews with many detailed multi-year accounts and consistent A-level outcomes, tempered by a few strong negative outliers.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

GENENG1017 reviews
ENG1035 reviews
ENGINEERING1015 reviews
EGT1004 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
Show 1 more courses
EGT1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 9 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values