AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Skarlet Sargisyan

MATH115 · MATH110 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Consider her only if you want no-nonsense basics instruction and can handle a firm style; otherwise wait for more data or another option.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerMixed reviewsStep-by-step mathNo excuses styleMandatory attendanceAttitude concerns
  • and real learning gains.
  • Another review rejects her entirely over attitude and recommends avoidance.
  • With only two reviews, outcomes look highly student-dependent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student earned an A by listening, focusing, and doing the work; there is no free-pass evidence.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty ratings are moderate and success depends on focus and practice rather than pure ease.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Both reviews mark attendance as review.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; the other says not to take any class with her.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Clear grading criteria helped one student succeed, but there is no evidence of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

and success requires doing the work; not clearly overwhelming from two reviews.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and and undercut by a harsh attitude complaint from another.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

and study skills with no detailed breakdown of .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

one student learned math clearly with , while another warned about attitude and .

Main concern

Attitude complaints and a tiny conflicting sample make the experience hard to predict.

What students said

“Organized and . She doesn't have attitude she just won't baby you or care for excuses.”
MATH115
“A lot of ”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format or proctoring policies beyond standard class expectations.

Clear grading criteriaHomework practice

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, or proctoring details for exams.

Clear grading criteria
“ and helps you with study skills. Listen, focus, ask questions, do the work and you cannot fail.”
MATH115

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would 1,000% recommend if you actually want to learn math basics.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting split opinions on teaching clarity versus attitude. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Organized and . This was the first time I actually understood Math.”

⚠️ Classroom Tone

30/100

“A lot of ”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“I would 1,000% recommend if you actually want to learn math basics.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Organized and .
  • and helps you with study skills.
  • She doesn't have attitude she just won't baby you or care for excuses.

Theme 2

📈 About Effort and Grades

  • Listen, focus, ask questions, do the work and you cannot fail.
  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • A lot of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

24/100

Evidence confidence

, so detail is limited and consistency is weak.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1101 review
MATH1151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values