AI Rate Professor

Economics

Aksoy Ergument

ECON1 · ECON330 · ECON001 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

possible for motivated readers, but and weak lecture support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLecture heavyMust read the bookPolarized reviewsPop quizzesOffice hours mixed
  • intro students credit him with sparking interest; upper-level students call lectures unstructured.
  • because lectures and study guides may not prepare you for .
  • and grades center on a few high-stakes assessments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Reported grades are mostly Cs with and limited assessment items, so an A .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Students , and lectures that do not fully explain the material.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Tags and comments stress attending every class; skipping is said to hurt your chance to pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Two of four students explicitly say avoid, and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, and few graded items leave little room for recovery.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and pop quizzes matter more than constant homework, but .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some call him helpful and ; others say lectures lack structure and office hours feel dismissive.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Graded by few things, with and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and unstructured upper-level lectures with tough tests and pop quizzes.

Main concern

Lectures can lack structure and study guides .

What students said

“love Dr Aksoy. heloed me fall in love with econ, even though I got a C.”
ECON001
“His lectures are all over the place and have no structure. His study guides are a joke and don't actually help.”
ECON330
“His lectures are not depth, so you have to read the book and know it by heart.”
ECON330

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as hard and book-dependent, with pop quizzes and weak study-guide support.

Hard testsPop quizzesStudy guides unhelpfulBook-heavy prep

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes are hard; students say you must memorize the book because lectures and guides fall short.

Hard testsPop quizzesBook-based prep
“ and uses big words... .”
ECON330
“His study guides are a joke and don't actually help.”
ECON330

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Probably one of the . He does not use PowerPoints or any sort of visual guide for his lectures.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews with a polarized split. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“love Dr Aksoy. heloed me fall in love with econ, even though I got a C.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

34/100

“ ”

📚

30/100

“His lectures are not depth, so you have to read the book and know it by heart.”

📝 Assessment Risk

32/100

“His study guides are a joke and don't actually help.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Helped me fall in love with econ
  • Lectures all over the place
  • No PowerPoints or visual guides

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Got a C
  • Pop quizzes
  • Graded by few things

Theme 3

📖 About Work Habits

  • Read the book
  • Attend all classes
  • Office hours mixed

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews with a sharp 2-2 quality split limits confidence in any single conclusion.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ECON3302 reviews
ECON0011 review
ECON11 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values