AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Ie Eileen

SOC12 · SOC7015 · SOC011 · SOC01 · SOC21 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you already know the material well and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderGet ready to readHigh expectationsUnclear communicationPolarizing
  • Reviews are sharply split between incredible and awful experiences.
  • , and little help make an A hard.
  • and high expectations dominate both online and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students report tough grading, almost impossible As, no , and one .

Online reviews stress unfair few-item grading; expertise.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Average difficulty is high, with intense reading and steep expectations especially online or accelerated terms.

Online winter sections called intense; in-person comments also cite high expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

One online section had optional attendance while ; .

Online ; in-person reviews do not clearly define policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About half would take her again; praise for clarity and engagement .

Online take-again is split yes/no; and do-not-take warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Tough grader tags, no , and reports that most hard work does not count toward the grade.

Format shift

Online review details few counting assignments; .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and hard study demands especially in short online terms.

Format shift

; online adds intense compressed workload.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some call directions crystal clear and lectures amazing, while , and biased.

Format shift

Online is polarized between incredible and horrible; in-person is similarly split.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Only a few high-stakes items such as chapter analyses and .

Format shift

Online review explicitly says most assignments do not count; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person comments range from highly recommend crystal-clear teaching to bias, no , and nearly impossible As.

Main concern

High expectations with little support or grade-recovery options.

What students said

“All her directions were crystal clear, you could reach if you did the reading.”
SOC21
“its almost impossible to get an A in her class, only if you're an expert in the topic! !!!”
SOC12
“She was awful and very bias. She would not do anything to help you get a decent grade.”
SOC7015

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews swing from eye-opening and engaging to unfair, unresponsive, and demoralizing with only a .

Main concern

response.

What students said

“Professor Ie is incredible. You really get the Zoom calls if you have the chance to.”
SOC011
“horrible professor she hardly responds to your emails and and critical, she grades unfair”
SOC01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments feel high-stakes because few items count and recovery options are limited.

Few graded items countQuizzesChapter analysisNo extra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

if you read, but there is no and little grade help.

Tests if you readNo extra credit
“ if you did the reading.”
SOC21
“she doesnt offer opportunities so .”
SOC12

Online

Online students mention quizzes and a couple of chapter analyses that dominate the grade; .

QuizzesChapter analysisFew items count
“she only grades two unanimous chapter analysis, introduction and ”
SOC01

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“its almost impossible to get an A in her class, only if you're an expert in the topic! !!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting grading toughness and polarized teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

24/100

“horrible professor she hardly responds to your emails and and critical, she grades unfair”

🎯 Polarized Teaching

52/100

“I would HIGHLY recommend this class or any other she teaches.”

📚 Heavy Expectations

35/100

“You will be assigned to read a ton, but it is incredibly engaging material.”

👎 Low Support

30/100

“She would not do anything to help you get a decent grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Ie is incredible.
  • All
  • She was awful and very bias.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • almost impossible to get an A
  • only grades two unanimous chapter analysis, introduction and quizzes
  • no opportunities

Theme 3

💻 About Online Intensity

  • The online class for winter was intense.
  • Be prepared to study, and work hard in this course, especially in the online class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six mixed reviews across online and and support, with enough detail for a moderate read.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

SOC212 reviews
SOC011 review
SOC0111 review
SOC121 review
SOC70151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values